Deconstruction

NY Review – Learning from a Modern Master

This review was so good I bought the book – The Fourth Dimension of a Poem. The reviewer, William H. Gass, introduced me to a new concept – deconstruction, which I had certainly heard of before,  but only in passing.

The High Priest of deconstructionism was Jacques Derrida – who sought to:

Find the element in the system studied which is alogical, the thread in the text in question that will unravel it all, or the loose stone that will pull down the whole building.

I must confess to doing some of this myself – trying to deconstruct the edifice of my parent’s world, and the business world I grew to hate – with a passion. All in vain – it refused to fall down.

I had used the words construction and destruction - and was shocked by destructiveness of the business world.

The literary world – which I was not familiar with – spoke of deconstruction, instead of destruction. This was the same process – with a longer word.

Now you know it too.

People Are Just Objects, Like Everything Else

Once I have said this, I must immediately define what an object is. I have two ways of doing this – the first is taken from linguistics,  and the second from programming.

A basic sentence has a subject, verb, object structure. The subject does something to an object. The subject is active, the object passive – but both are things, only the verb is active. Buckminster Fuller, who became something of a new age guru back in the Sixties – once proclaimed that he was a verb. And that made sense at the time.

Objects in programming take more explaining – unless you were a programmer in the Eighties and Nineties, when Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) was the rage. Programming styles come and go – with no more logic than the styles in woman’s clothing. Back then, OOP was the thing - and everyone wanted to do it, whether they understood it or not.

Someone should do some in-depth psychoanalysis of this sometime, and figure out what was really going on. But that won’t be done because we were all swept up into something bigger – the boom of the last decade of the last century and the bust of first decade of this one. This has all kinds of names (such as the Dotcom Boom) – but at the time we called it mostly the Internet Boom.

At the time, we felt that the Internet was so powerful it had created a New Economy where everyone would get rich automatically. And part of this, somehow was OOP, There was also Java – which took the programming world by storm. Which incorporated both OOP and the Internet.

This was too much for me – and in 2001 I retired and moved to Costa Rica. I still keep in touch with what is going on in the Software world. And right now I am re-thinking the significance of objects. And realizing that it they were a significant part of what was going on in the 19th and 20th Centuries.

The Industrial Revolution (and there were several of them) were processes in which machines became more and more important. And people became less and less important. And the most important part of this change was our growing inability to understand this.

We were fast becoming objects – things. We no longer existed as humans.

As humans, we were animals – with an important difference. And we were fully aware of this difference – at least in our better moments. But we were losing this awareness.

I will never forget my mother screaming “I’m not an animal!” And indeed she was not. She was a strange being we had no words for – but she acted like a demon.

For the time being, I want to call these people objects – but I also want to note that they are demons. And to be fair, I have to put myself right among them.

Now I must say more about being an object. It is similar to being a machine – but with important differences. It can be programmed – and it can use this programming to interact with other objects. It has no mind of its own – no existence of its own. If it did, it would be destroyed.

The overall structure is familiar enough – a machine. But a machine with programmable components.

Is this anything new? No, it is not terribly new, societies have been acting like machines for a long time. Human machines built the pyramids.

But it is different in a subtle way – the components (objects) are more flexible, and they expect (even want) to be changed frequently. They do not want to have a permanent identity – as people do in more traditional societies.

A cynic will observe that if you peel away all this surface craziness – there are still humans underneath this. And their basic functioning (the reproductive urge, for example) has not changed. Perhaps, but one can also observe that things like the sex drive have also been profoundly altered – and sex objects are common.

We may not have become objects entirely – but we are close to it.

The Solution That is No Solution

The solution I refer to is my own personal solution to the problem of living in the world – the Internet world of today.

I cannot claim any originality here – I can only refer to two other writers:

  • Evgeny Morozov, who wrote To Save Everything, Click – who is from Estonia.
  • Slavoj Zizek, who wrote The Puppet and the Dwarf – who is from Slovenia.

They have the unique advantage of being from nowhere. As I do – I live in the Limbo between the US and Costa Rica – and the Net.

This is from the back cover, by Toomas Hendrik Ilves, the president of the Republic of Estonia:

When it comes to anything “Internet” related, Evgeny Morozov is the writer who brings us back to earth. Lubricated by snake oil, too much of what we read about the Internet and the possibilities offered by modern technology is hypertext hyperbole.

In this riotous read, Morozov continues his quest to restore empirical rationality in our own thinking about our techno-Utopian pipe-dreams. We have become gullible to what Morozov calls solutionism, the idea that whatever complex situations we face, we can solve it simply by finding the right algorithm, and thanks to technology we can find a solution.

We have seen this before with Condorcet and other thinkers of the Enlightenment, but then, as now, too much reliance on mathematics when we are working on problems of people and society leads inevitably to failure. Today, we who live, work, and dream in cyberspace need Morozov to keep our feet firmly planted on Terra Firma.

I heard about this book from reviews in Scientific American the MIT Technology Review. Scientists (real scientists) are more rounded people than we give them credit for.

I would add only one thing – the people he is presumably trying to write to (the masses) no longer exist. And there is no way they can be brought back to life.

The Global Power Structure That Has No Power

The power I am referring to is the power to motivate people. Whether we like it or not – people power is still where it’s at. If it’s not there – we haven’t got it.

You have heard of Globalization – which is supposed to be the next big thing. But I am here to tell you that this next big thing is nothing. Literally. I could go into a long dissertation about something and nothing here – and I am listening to a book right now called Why is there something instead of nothing? that does just that. But I will spare you.

Let me start again. The world (the human world, that is) for the last three hundred years or so has been obsessed with making money. But we (and especially the young) are no longer much interested this. It doesn’t turn us on any more. And if it doesn’t interest us – it is going nowhere. 

Let me put this yet another way. We all know about booms and busts. Everybody gets excited about something (it gets hot) then they lose interest in it – and it gets cold. These cycles (what used to be called the Business Cycle) used to take years. Now they are lucky to last for a day.

This indicates, to me, that they no longer have any substance. There is nothing behind them.

People still want money as much as before – but they no longer want to work for it. They will steal whatever they can lay their hands on (legally) but will only pretend to be working. And this applies to companies, as well as individuals. Everybody. You don’t have to be a genius to see where this leads to.

I have been speaking so far about motivation – or the lack thereof. And I continue to believe this is the most fundamental problem.

But this can also be seen in more concrete ways – we are running out of gas (oil). All the development of the last three hundred years or so was fueled by fossil fuels. Energy reserves left over, by accident, from millions of years of plant life.

And climate change is fast upon us. We can deny it all we want – but it is a fact.

The overall result (and that is all that counts) is this:

Progress is running out of steam.

Bruce Schneier

Crypto-Gram Newsletter - June 15, 2013

There has been a lot of sound and fury lately about America’s spying on everybody. This is nothing new to Bruce – he has been writing about this for a long time – but few have paid any attention to him – and no doubt few will continue to pay attention to him in the future.

Trying to understand this issue is just too much work – even though he works as hard as he can to simplify it, without overlooking anything important.

If you want to know about this – and really know about it – take some time to read, and digest, what he says here. Especially the first part Government Secrets and the Need for Whistleblowers.

Here is the final paragraph:

Our government is putting its own self-interest ahead of the interests of the country. That needs to change.

How the End Will Come

I have to add my two-cents worth to this popular subject. Although it is usually put differently – this (fill in the blanks) will save us from the end we all know is coming.

When I start thinking about this I back up in time to the biggest collapse of all – the fall of the Roman Empire. There are endless theories about how this happened. But at the time, only one thing was obvious – tribes from the North were plundering Rome. In other words – a vast military defeat was in progress. The unthinkable had happened – and all people could do was run as fast as they could – usually to Northern Africa, where the Mediterranean kept them safe – if impoverished. Rome never recovered.

Will this happen again? I doubt it – although most people seem to think it will – that terrorists are at the gate, about to overwhelm us. The slightest thought will show anyone that this is not so. But still people are terrified – and America maintains a huge military presence to reassure them. And a huge spying network to monitor everyone. As does China.

The end will come, I believe, in the Economy – and is now in progress. We live in a Global Economy where every part of it depends on every other part. Right now, the European economy is in bad shape – and a collapse there is almost certain. The American economy (the biggest one there is) is feeble and cannot help it. China – now the manufacturer for the world – is completely dependent on the rest of the world to buy its products.

Add to this the behavior of the Financial Industry – which is busy raiding the global treasury. Making a very few very rich – and making everyone else poorer in various degrees.

The end result is not hard to predict – global economic collapse.

Lying

Lying is not longer a moral issue – it is simply a strategy to get what you want (as in advertising). And it is not too far out to suggest that Morality itself is no longer an issue – because it may be at variance with what other people (especially those in power) want us to subscribe to.

And because it requires too much thinking – which is not seen as a good thing for people to be doing. Or at an even more basic level – it requires a certain amount of being – to give you the ground to stand on to make judgments.

This is not to say that people do not make moral judgments – they make them all the time. But these are only judgments they have picked up from other people – and they want to be like them. In fact the they I just referred to is a tenuous, fleeting thing with no enduring presence. Being is a dangerous state that people avoid as much as possible.

Or, to put all of this in another way – we have been reduced to behaving and thinking like small children.

None of this is very flattering – and since we are adults (and should know better) we are ashamed of ourselves.

There are all kinds of books (and all kinds of speeches) about some of the smaller issues I have described. But no one wants to put it all together – and say our overall situation is nothing less than terrifying. Why?

People go to movies that scare them to death – just for the fun of it. Preachers rant about the apocalypse. But this kind of scare seems to be too much. Too much for us to handle.

I must respectfully disagree. There is nothing too big for us to handle. If we have to, we can look death calmly in the face. Although it makes little difference how we look at death – we all die anyway. And we have to say the same about all of us collectively – we are dying. Or more accurately – we have died, and are now just finishing the process.

If I tell people what I have just told you – they will just say “It couldn’t possibly be that way!” And proceed as before – happily messing up the world, and themselves.

This is a kind of accomplishment, I have to admit. But it strikes me as a perverse one.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 385 other followers