Archive for the ‘ Business ’ Category

Calvinism and Corporatism

I had always been of the opinion that Puritanism was something that had no lasting effect on America; something strange that didn’t effect mainline America. But professor Guelzo has changed my mind. He is just the kind of thinker I like – but not the kind most Americans like. He is no longer offered by the Teaching Company. I was lucky to grab him and download his good stuff, before he got silenced.

In his course outline he speaks of:

Two souls in the American consciousness, one the product of Puritan religion and the
other the product of America’s embrace of the Enlightenment.

He then goes on to describe what Puritanism was, which was largely Calvinism with some fine tuning. Calvinism has five fundamental points known by the acronym TULIP:

Total depravity
Unconditional election
Limited atonement
Irresistible grace
Perseverance of the saints

Here again, you may be wondering what this has to do with us – with contemporary America. In my opinion, it has a lot to do with the American experience - particularly the corporate experience – which is, for all practical purposes, America itself.

Consider the first: Total Depravity. Beneath the surface of its mandatory optimism this is one of corporation’s key beliefs.  People in their natural, depraved state must be transformed into material suitable for inclusion in the corporate state of grace. This is what the schools are for – and also television, the ultimate teaching tool.

The other points fall right into line too – see the excellent article in Wikipedia for this.

I was even surprised to find its effect on Mormonism, the faith of my family-of-origin – which I had always dismissed as merely one of the oddball movements in American history. They call themselves Latter-Day Saints, which always seemed odd to me. But this is standard Calvinistic terminology:

The word “saints” is used in the Biblical sense to refer to all who are set apart by God, not in the technical sense of one who is exceptionally holycanonized, or in heaven.

And to return to the corporate setting, Perseverance of the Saints means that the we must continue to consider the corporation divine – no matter what. It has become our new religion.

Americans are Destroying America

This is coninuation of my last posting Childhood Abuse Creates Destructive Adults. My friend Jane helped me to consolidate my thinking here, as your will see by our comments. In these I referred to the high level of violence in the world in general – which is do doubt due to many interacting factors no one really understands. In this posting I am going to narrow my focus to America in the last 150 years, where a lot has been happening – much of it destructive, and much of it by Americans themselves.

Here again, we are dealing with denial – the refusal of Americans to realize how bad off America really is. They repeat that America will pull through again, because it has done so often often in the past. They do this without any clear understand of just what these crises were or when they happened. They just happened somehow, they believe, and that is good enough for them. America the Wonderful cannot fail.

But it has failed, and it has failed from the inside out because we are not the people we once were. And this applies to much of the Affluent World. Their leaders get together periodically to solve the world’s problems, and make it perfectly clear they have no idea what they are – let alone how to solve them.

Most will deny this basic fact adamantly – simply because admitting is to horrible to contemplate. It means the end of world they have believed in all their lives.  There is no way I can convince them otherwise.

They say in effect “How come I can’t see all these things you say you can see?” If I were blunt, I would say “Because you can’t see very much.” Needless to say, this would help very much. We are separated by a narrow river, but one where the waters run deep, and people on either side cannot understand each other.

My experiences at work in the high-tech world were so painful they have scarred me for life. But most in that environment did not suffer so much. I cannot understand them, and they cannot understand me.

But here is an objective fact: most high-tech companies fail and usually fail fairly quickly. Silicon Valley is filled with monuments to their passing. Knowledge workers continually move from one to another. And continually ignore the bigger picture. They just consider it a fact of life, something they have to put up with and get around somehow. Something entirely normal and beneficial; creative destruction that never ends.

Here is another objective fact: America do longer does much manufacturing, and this situation is permanent. We hear that the service economy is going to take up the slack, but no one knows exactly what this is or how it is going to work. Gradually, it is becoming clear – it is not working. The last thing companies want to do is hire more people – and it is picky about who they do hire, and then abuse them in many ways. They don’t treat their customers much better.

But this doesn’t matter. What does matter is people’s reaction to this – at the unconscious level. They simply say “If you are going to kill us, we are going to kill you.” And then go about doing this, acting almost like robots – but robots with a firm, simple objective in mind.

Now go ahead and tell me “Hal, you don’t know what the hell you are talking about.”

People are not Machines, but Organizations are

I recently realized that people are not machines, and this has been quite a shock to me. I am convinced that most do not realize the difference, overlook it, and carry on as machines without realizing it – this was most certainly the case for me. This behavior is most clearly seen at work – where they are clearly part of a machine – which in turn is part of the ultimate machine: the global economy.

Now that it is becoming clear to us that the global economy is not working, we need to look at it more carefully, and see what is wrong with it. To my mind, the problem is obvious – it is not people-oriented, and so it can hardly be expected to produce results that are good for people – or for life in general. But this is the last thing it wants to do – it insists on operating like a machine, and becoming more and more like a machine. And the people in it are so reduced to being machines themselves, they cannot object.

I said they have become machines – just what does that mean? It means they have lost any direction of their own – and have become completely controlled by the grand machine – which gives everyone its own role to occupy – and no other.

The Grand Machine is totalitarian, ruthless, and destructive. It may cover this by sponsoring humanitarian causes, which it points to proudly. These are financed by a fixed amount of its profits – less than 5 percent – which leaves 95 percent for business as usual.

People have become so used to being treated as machines – most importantly, by their parents – that they cannot be human beings – and cover this inadequacy with all kinds of possessions and compulsive activities.

At the unconscious level – the level that counts – they are determined to destroy the world that has destroyed them.

Power Destroys People

This is an ancient observation, but today it is more true than ever, because power has become more powerful than ever. At the same time it has become more invisible, and more able to convince us of its innocence. People have become powerless, and prefer being that way.

Overall, this is an alarming situation – the worst one that could be imagined – if you are interested in people. If, on the other hand, you are interested in power, it is the best situation imaginable.

Let me put this another way. The present world, where power rules supreme, is destroying the human race. We can no longer conceive of a world devoted to human development, only the development of power and technology. The two go together. People are left serving this complex.

Develop Ourselves, or Develop our Technologies?

The proper response to this question is to deny that it exists. The conventional wisdom affirms that better technology means better people – especially the latest economic technology. But that is a huge subject in itself, and I am not going that way today. What I am interested in now is a different technology – the computer, software, network complex that is engrossing us now.

When I say us, this certainly includes me. I have been taken over by my newest obsession: a Android handset. I could go on about this easily, and devote this entire posting to it – but I will force myself to stay on subject – and write about developing our technology, or developing ourselves instead. A very important subject – since our survival as a species depends on it.

When I say us, I certainly include myself, as I struggle to stay in touch with myself when I keep wanting to touch my new Android handset instead it (it has a touch interface). This is a dramatic lesson in the irresistibility of  high-tech. We have to become part of it – whether we want to or not. And then it takes over us.

This brings up an important point: how can inanimate objects take over us? Strictly speaking, they cannot – but practically speaking, they can – and do. This needs to be looked at more carefully – and has been looked at more carefully by far more qualified people than myself. All I can do is summarize their findings in my own language. For an exhaustive treatment of this subject I recommend Jacques Ellul’s The Technological Society.

As I see it, the situation is this:

Man is a tool-making animal, but now his tools have become more important to himself than he is to himself. He has become absorbed into their ecosystems, and they are using him for their own purposes. He no longer exists as human individuals or as the human species – only as as a socio-technical system.

Digital Ecosystem

This is an important new term. According to Wikipedia:

Digital Ecosystem is any distributed adaptive open socio-technical system, with properties of self-organisation, scalability and sustainability, inspired by natural ecosystems.

This is a fine, academic description – but academia has now become unimportant. They only thing that is important is the business world – which rules all. I do not have to document this obvious fact – I only have to show how digital technology interacts with it, and has become part of it:

Companies now have to manufacture their own digital ecosystems – and get other players to join them – or perish.

Apple is hard at work on this – and is the poster boy of the whole movement. It aims to create its own digital kingdom where it rules supreme. Microsoft is trying to do this too – but much less successfully – it is still relying on its old business model of proprietary software that everyone will have to buy.

The real winner will probably be Google – who does understand this new ecosystem – because it is making large pieces of it – in coordination with its allies – the only way to build a digital ecosystem. Microsoft and Apple, by contrast, still want to control everything. Google only wants to be a key player.

But I have digressed, I started to write about the deleterious effects of technology on humans. But instead I focused on technology. See how easily it is to get off track? Now I can get back to writing about us – after all, we are the ones doing all this.

I have already made my key point – that we now focus on our technologies, not on ourselves. And this is a fatal error – to use a computing term. Unless we focus on ourselves, we are doomed.

And to be perfectly blunt – we are already doomed, because we have forgotten about ourselves so completely we cannot find our way back. We are the only beings that can save us – and we no longer exist in this Brave New World.

Don’t Buy Anything Before You Read a Review About It On the Net

If I had done this, I would have saved myself $150. I got the hots for a iPad kind of device, but with the Android operating system. Trade Tang had one for $130; shipping was free to the States, but it cost me $20 to get it to Costa Rica; total: $150 – money I will never see again.

Once I started using it, I knew something was wrong – right way I saw the user’s manual was practically useless. After wasting some more time, I realized the whole thing was practically useless.

As always, I did learn something from this mistake. Apple gets a ridiculous price for its i-Pad because they hold the user’s hand all the way. People like that, and are willing to pay through the nose to get it.

Maybe in six months, when some really good Android devices hit the market I will bite again. But I will let other people check it out first. It’s amazing how many of them there are out there – eager to tell you all about it.

The Advantages of a Religious Childhood

My religious childhood was advantageous to me in some ways, and I want to go into them. But first, I have to make it clear that, on balance, I would not have chosen that childhood. It was just too insane – to put it bluntly. But we do not get to chose our family-of-origin – we just have to accept it as a fact of life, and then go on and build our own lives as best we can.

But let me go on with the advantages. Perhaps this will help other people with religious backgrounds who are having trouble understanding them also. First of all, having a religious background of the kind I had was a big deal. My parents took their religion very seriously, it was by far the most important thing in their lives. If your religious background was less intense, you may not be able to relate to mine – or understand what an impact it had on me.

I suppose you could say that this prepared me for a life of great seriousness, and a disinterest in any other kind of life. Whether this was a good thing or not, I am not sure.

My parents took a dim view of the world in general. For them worldliness was a pejorative. The world was full of sin, and they were about that kind of thing. They considered themselves saints - and indeed that was part of the name of their church: they were Latter-Day Saints. They liked being superior, and their favorite phrase was “Be in the world, but not of it.”

This had a huge impact on my working life. My background contained an emphasis on doing it right – and I found the work-a-day world hostile to this attitude. Doing it right consists of two things: an emphasis on morality (what is right) and an emphasis on effective behavior (being competent in what you are doing, and in general making a world that worked). To my shock, I discovered the office environment encouraged neither.

To this day, I am not sure what it does encourage, but I have the uncomfortable feeling that it is not very nice. Whatever it is, it does demand loyalty to its own kind of craziness – its own kind of religion.

So there I was, as conflicted as I could be, with two religions fighting over my life. I can see this now, years after the fact, when I have had time to reflect on it – but at the time I didn’t know what was really going on. I just knew some kind of painful conflict was going on in the deep recesses of my life.

Frack, Baby, Frack

Scientific American: Fracking to Free Natural Gas?

The news about the  BP oil spill is public property. But information about what really happened there is not public property; it is private property: proprietary information. This situation has become too familiar – the companies get the profits, if they don’t screw up too badly – and the public gets the bill for the damages, if they do.

This doesn’t seem fair.

But life isn’t fair, you may say – and you would be right. But that is only part of the picture. What has been going on, for the last several centuries, has been the gradual takeover of public property by private organizations. This is especially true of intellectual property, where companies are on a big land grab to fence off information that is essentially public -such as genome information.

Let me give you another example: information about what lies under the earth. I traveled past Butte, Montana not too long ago, and read the highway sign The Richest Hill on Earth. It’s not a hill anymore, its actually a small depression, so much wealth has been taken out of it. Now only weeds remain.

The same could be said of almost any factory town – or entire manufacturing areas, such as Detroit. Where did all the wealth go? But I have digressed, I started to write about our knowledge of what is below us, in the earth in general. This information has become critical because new mining technologies can be so destructive.

I am thinking of fracking (hydraulic fracturing) in particular. The basic facts are impressive: the Marcellus shale in the US could supply the nation’s natural gas needs for 40 years. And burning natural gas causes 40 percent less carbon dioxide than burning coal. The process is simple in theory: hydraulic fluids are pumped into these shale formations to fracture the rock and release the gas. There is only one problem: no one knows, in any detail, what the rock formations are like down there. They are often quite complicated with nature fractures everywhere. And some of these proprietary hydraulic fluids are nasty stuff – not something you would want popping up in your back yard. The drilling companies refuse to say what is in them.

Ironically, much of this underground information is already known – many natural gas wells have already been dug in these areas, and the drilling companies carefully log the kind of rock encountered as the wells are drilled. And then carefully guard this proprietary information. In reality, it just gets lost as exploration moves elsewhere. This information should have been considered public property, and it could have been used to predict the success and dangers of fracking.

I used to go running on Summerland Beach, just north of Santa Barbara, California. It was one of my favorite areas. But one day part of the beach was fenced off – because an old oil well was leaking. I was astonished, oil wells there? But sure enough, the park service showed us pictures of oil derricks on the beach some time ago. The oil companies pumped the oil and then left – without cleaning up properly. It was this way all over Southern California – there was oil everywhere. Now it is gone and California is becoming a waste land.

Gulf leak: biggest spill may not be biggest disaster

New Scientist

Americans dearly love to get upset about all kinds of things – and then pontificate about them. For me, the oil spill was simply the latest example of corporate stupidity – something all too common, and unlikely to go away.

A scientific assessment of the situation is the last thing we want to know about – but this article does it anyway. In summary: this spill will probably have little long-term effect on the Gulf.

Overfishing the entire oceans, however, is a serious matter – but one that gets little attention.

Corporate Power

I have been running off the mouth about the power complex, but that term hasn’t grabbed many people – it is too abstract for them to relate to. So I have decided to simplify and call it corporate power, which everyone can relate to – because everyone has worked for some kind of large organization, which is basically some kind of corporation – at least in people’s minds. Organization power, for some reason doesn’t hit them as hard – although technically it is more correct.

The corporation sounds evil – and they can relate to that for sure.

Corporations work constantly to convince the public of their benevolence. People, especially employees, agree – on a superficial level – but in their heart of hearts they know that something that only thinks of itself cannot be very nice.

Examples of corporate malfeasance are so blatant and so common they cannot be ignored. It has been always been known that power corrupts – and business is all about power – getting it and keeping it.

I do not intend to continue corporation-bashing – because that would simply be tilting against windmills. The wind will continue to blow (create power) and people who crave power, for various reasons, will figure out ways of getting power – often at the expense of other people. It has alway been thus.

However, it must be said that corporate power, in its present form (sometimes called globalization) is something new and especially frightening – because people have no natural immunity to it – and even are not aware of its existence.

Indeed, many of my readers are probably convinced that my paranoia is talking now, not my brain. They may be saying “Yes, there is plenty of corporate malfeasance out there, and always will be, but that does not mean corporations as a whole are a threat to humanity.”

Thank you for clarifying my point: I do believe they are a threat to humanity. Why? Because they have made humans, in the humanistic sense, obsolete. They only want people who will serve them, and ignore their human needs – such as their needs for justice and compassion – to name only two.

You may say “Be realistic, you want too much!” I am willing to compromise, but not on certain principles, especially the one that people are important. The corporations do not agree: only they are important, and human needs have to take second place to their needs – including their need to control everything – which, let’s face it, they have already.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 361 other followers