Archive for the ‘ Education ’ Category

The Perils of Being Perfect

Mark C. Taylor in the NY Times (check out the other links at the left too, they are excellent)

In today’s market-driven economy we constantly hear that choice is the highest good and that competition fuels innovation. But this is not always true. Choice provokes anxiety and competition can quell the imagination and discourage the spirit of experimentation that is necessary for creativity. In a world obsessed with ratings, well-meaning parents all too often train their children to jump through the hoops they think will lead to success.

This was a bad bet – the course many young people were forced to take has not paid off. The lucrative jobs they expected as a reward for years of hard work have vanished and show little sign of returning in the near future. The difficult truth is that their education has not prepared them for the world they facing.

And these are the kids from the most successful families! Image what chances the rest have.

One of the Causes of Cybercrime

UP: US gets suspect in hacking case that spanned world

The increasing scope of foreign attacks comes as college students around the world are focusing heavily on technology degrees only to emerge into a difficult job market with low pay, officials said.

“When you can’t find a legitimate job making big money, you find some way to make money,” said Colleen Moss, the head of the FBI’s Cyber Crime Squad in North Carolina. “There’s a lot of high-tech trained folks out there who either don’t have a job or aren’t making what they’d like to.”

Here was their take:

Then, in the span of 12 hours around Nov. 8 of that year, the group hit 2,100 ATM terminals in 280 cities spanning the world, from the United States to Russia to Italy to Japan. Prosecutors say they withdrew $9 million — a haul that rivals 1,000 typical bank robberies in the United States.

Not bad!

People Have Two Ways of Operating

We can operate as mechanisms, and use mechanical reasoning – or we can use our own kind of reasoning, and operate as humans.

The boundary between the two has never been clear; but nobody worried about that. We just went on using both ways, whichever way seemed that best for the situation at hand. But gradually, over the last two hundred years or so, the mechanistic mode began to dominate. We began to operate more like things than like humans.

I assume so far my line of reasoning seems fairly reasonable to you – a trifle hysterical perhaps, but not too far out. If so, you do not understand the seriousness of the problem, and I will have to try harder.

The problem is that we don’t understand the nature of our two ways of being. They have resided in our unconsciousness, ready to be used – without understanding them at all. It’s now time to come clean with you and confess that this idea is not mine at all. I got most of them from the book The Technological Society by Jacques Elllul. This was written, in French, in 1954 – and the published in English in 1964. And virtually ignored since then.

Many agreed that it was important – but no one wanted to admit they couldn’t understand it. This amazes me, because I can almost understand it – and its importance blows me away. How come no one else is impressed as I am? In some ways I seem to have some unusual insights into what is going on in whatever environment I am in – especially the work environment. Not that this has done me much good. Normal people think I am just seeing things that are not really there. However, let me resume my train of thought.

Ellul keeps talking about technique - over and over – clearly an obsession with him. The basics here are simple – so simple you would not believe it. What he calls technique we now call programming – in the computer sense – an algorithm. Do this, and this, and then this. The computer then does exactly what we tell it to do. All well and good.

Now consider the technique of propaganda, or marketing. Some clever people have figure out a way to do the same kind of programming with people. People have become so used to following subliminal suggestions, they perform them automatically.

At this point, you may be saying “Not me! I am too smart to be fooled by advertising.” You are exactly the kind of person’s advertiser’s love – someone completely out of touch with how the media affects them. You can take comfort in one thing, however – you have a lot of company – nearly everybody.

From this concrete example, we can generalize to nearly everything else. In a sense, we have outsmarted ourselves. Our concentration on technology has made us forget what it is like to be human.

Some theory is in order here – straight from Ellul, whose insights amazed me. Any technique tends to become autonomous in its domain. It will dominate it, and impose its own logic on it. For example, the propaganda technique is only interested in controlling people’s minds – and as totally and efficiently as possible. Note the emphasis on efficiency, this the the inevitable effect of any technique.

Take the economic technique. This changes a traditional economy, which is always part of a society, and controlled by it – into a vast machine completely operating only by its own rules. In other words, the market economy, which has no interest in human affairs – only efficiency – on its own terms. The WTO in action.

And the list of techniques goes on indefinitely. None of them has any interest in human needs – and instead turns humans into minor players in its own ball game. Are you following me? I doubt it. This is the core problem we have as an advanced society. A problem we are determined to overlook because it has progressed so far the horror of it is imaginable.

What Ellul could not see was that in the last 50 years all our techniques would merge into one huge mega-technique I call the techno-corporate complex – which includes nearly every organization in existence. Eisenhower’s military-industrial complex is at its core, but it includes all three branches of the Federal Government (which it owns, like everything else), the Media (especially television), the Financial industry – and more and more, the Educational Establishment. Throw in our penal institutions for good measure. This is all made possible by computers and the Internet. As far as people are concerned, the one important fact here is that it owns all the jobs – and it has no interest in them as humans.

So far I have only discussed the mechanical way of being. What about the human way of being? Does this exist? If you were able read American’s minds the answer would probably be – that they don’t really believe in it – or at best they are suspicious of its existence.

Indeed some schools of psycho-therapy don’t believe in it either – although they are reluctant to come right out and say so.I have in mind here the cognitive behavior-modification types, who do not believe in the unconscious mind. Now Freud’s theories have been largely discounted, but his discovery of the unconscious ranks as one of our outstanding achievements – a big part of our discovery of who we are.

What we are is ultimately a mystery – as the wise have told us since ancient times. In contrast to the mechanical way of being, which can be easily understood. We can say very few things for certain about ourselves – except that, at our best, we are creative creatures. All the hoopla about artificial intelligence is just that – with some predicting that computers will take over the world. In a sense, they are right – but not in the way they think. We have allowed computers (mechanical thinking) to take over – computers can do nothing on their own.

So again, what does it mean to be human? It means being irrational creatures part of the time, and rational creatures part of the time. It means having an unconscious part of us that is most of what we are. This is what makes us so interesting and strange - even to ourselves. When we lose interest in ourselves, by paying too much attention to our things, we are doomed.

But there is more to being human. We are social beings – intensely so. We form attachments to other people – if we cannot do this as infants, we die. Unfortunately, as adults our social skills are atrophying – as described in the book Born to Love: why empathy is essential and endangered. What else could be expected from people who are becoming like machines? Computers, needless to say, don’t do any of this.

And there is one more thing: humans need respect and recognition from their fellow-humans. The present totalitarian trend in America denies any respect for human dignity. People only respect power and money – nothing else. Is this part of being human? Yes, but its least attractive part. It may end up being all we have left of a once noble heritage.

Learning About Being Human From a Professor

Professor Watson can do this because he is human and uses many examples from his own life. Not something all professors care to do. I am taking his course Theories of Human Development from the Learning Company. He made me remember when I was a child and Rogene, Steve, and I would play in the creek under the waterfall, pretending we were racing our boats, which were just pieces of wood we picked up on the spot. It was interesting seeing how each boat would go its own way, depending on how the current took it. Quite often, it got stuck and went nowhere, but that was no problem, we could always start over.

This course has been a life-changing experience for me. At the age of 73 I am finally learning how humans become human. Something I didn’t learn very well from my parents, who no doubt didn’t have much help from their parents either. And something my school teachers didn’t understand either.

Steve Jobs Live

TED: Steve Jobs: How to live before you die

I have always wondered about this guy: what kind of guy was he? I knew an engineer once who had worked for him at Apple, and he hated him – flat out. Since my friend seemed to be a good judge of character, this made me wonder. Steve is obviously an accomplished performer, and knows how to manipulate people, but what was behind that flashy exterior? I was suspicious.

But this video changed my mind: he is a genuine person, and has his own ideas. I don’t doubt he has his dark side too, but who doesn’t?

The Feds and the Schools

Truthout

At first I didn’t know what to make of this. He seems to have a flippant attitude towards the subject. Perhaps he is trying to be satirical. He has seen so many educational disasters he has grown used to them. But then I decided to do the right thing: put on my thinking cap and give it a serious read.

He starts out being anti-business, a stance I can sympathize with:

Deeply embedded in the conventional wisdom is the idea that educating is mostly about making a living rather than making a life. Given that assumption, education reforms that promise to “make America competitive in the global marketplace” or “prepare learners for productive work” are an easy sell. There’s broad agreement that what industry wants, industry should get.

He then goes on to discuss standards, the lack of which was something that I suffered from personally as student. My high school and religious junior college were definitely sub-standard academically. When I finally got to the University of Illinois, I promptly flunked out of my science courses – and had to become an engineer instead. Contrary to what you have been told, you don’t have to be very bright to be an engineer – just a hard worker.

So quality Federal standards sounded like a good idea to me. Get rid of all those lousy teachers and schools! There would be a lot of empty buildings left, but that would be better than buildings filled with miserable kids:

American education is going to be changed forever. Just about everybody thinks that standards are a good thing, so replacing a hodge-podge of state standards with a single national set has broad support. The playing field will be leveled. Teachers will know exactly what to teach. Kids will know what they’re expected to know. Textbook publishers will know what to print. Schools of education will know what to emphasize. Testing companies will know what they can peddle. Data collectors will know what data to collect. And taxpayers will know what they’re getting for their money.

There is only one problem: idiots are in charge of the standards-making process. I have been there before myself: when I worked as an engineer for the military. We had one engineer who was a genuine idiot, and he loved to write standards. He could write a standard for anything, the less he know about it the better. Anything developed according to his standards were guaranteed not to work.

These new school standards are much the same. He asks:

Should a standard for reading say, “Learners will be able to sound out unfamiliar words,” or should it say, “Learners will develop a love of reading”? Should a standard for math say, “Learners will be able to solve quadratic equations,” or should it say, “Learners will understand statistics that reveal the trends of the era”?

Corporate America has given us Big Banks – banks too big to fail. Corporate America has given us Big Pharma – a pharmaceutical industry too big to fight. Coming soon to a school near you, courtesy of corporate America: Big Ed – a centralized education system too big to question its self-serving, profit-driven, intellect-destroying priorities.

The Dog Whisperer

South Park Studios

Kids are out of control. Parents make them the center of their lives, and they turn into adults useless to society. Why is this? Because parents haven’t made lives for themselves, the kind of parenting every child needs.

I don’t watch TV, so I was unaware of this series, which is really sophisticated adult entertainment.

Watch it here for free, although you may have fuss with their player to get to see the whole thing.

Why Kids Can’t Read

Teacher Professional Development

To my simple mind, the answer is simple: because we don’t want them to. We are not interested in making them literate, or educated in any other way. Not really. Of course, we say just the opposite, but actions speak louder than words.

But let the experts speak for themselves – as they often do on Education Week, an excellent source. Richard Allington, whose credentials are awesome:

I’m 62. And literally, since I entered the education field at 21 and became a reading specialist the following year, the promise has been held that we’re going to teach all kids to read. The good news is that, in the past five or 10 years, we’ve had large-scale demonstrations that show that in fact we could do that if we wanted to. We have studies involving multiple school districts and hundreds or thousands of kids demonstrating that, with quality instruction and intervention, 98 percent of all kids can be reading at grade level by the end of 1st or 2nd grade.

So it’s not a question that we don’t know what to do. It’s a question of having the will to develop full literacy in this country, and to organize schools and allocate money in ways that would allow us to do that. Instead, we’ve tended to come up with flim-flam excuses for why it’s not possible.

What is Obama doing about this? Much the same as Bush: he is making the situation worse, while pretending to make it better.

Race to Top, What is It?

NY Times

First of all, it is clear that the Feds want to gain control of the school system. I have mixed feelings about this: the school system is such a mess someone needs to get control of it – but I am suspicious of Arne Duncan’s motivations, and of his lack of teaching expertise. He seems to think that if our schools can be privatized, turned into businesses, only good things will happen.

This ignores the disastrous results of turning our economy over to the tender mercies of various industries, such as the financial industry. Letting them care for our children seems like an equally disastrous idea.

There are plenty of educators at the university level who have excellent qualifications, and their expertise should be used to reform the educational system, using Federal muscle – not some bureaucratic nobody with close ties to the military.

The Corporate Person and Job Security

I am in the process of reading The Organization Man – which was written in 1956. The author, William H. Whyte Jr. tells of his experiences interviewing college seniors for jobs in large companies. Large companies were what they were after, because they were convinced the big boys had it made – and they wanted to prosper with them. They hired the best talent, and they did the most research, so how could they go wrong? Besides, they had those fabulous retirement and pension plans. Big was Better.

They were both right and wrong. Bigness was were the money was going to be – but only for the few who had golden parachutes. Big companies often failed in a big way – taking those retirement plans down with them.

So what is a college graduate (or anyone in the job market) to do now? My solution, and that of many others, was to job-hop as nimbly as possible – and to keep an ample reserve for those long periods of unemployment.

And change careers frequently. This seems clear now that I am looking back at it. You gotta stay ahead of the game – and pick a game that you like. You gotta put yourself first. I made big mistake of becoming an engineer, because that was considered a good career choice – when I really wanted to be a forest ranger – and be outdoors. I hated being cooped up in an office.

Much later, when I became sick of tech writing, I became interested in a new way of monitoring the progress of large high-tech projects. A job was open in that, and I probably could have gotten it – but it would have required moving from Silicon Valley to Redstone Arsenal in Alabama. I was reluctant to leave all the excitement and glamor of the Valley.

Big mistake. Instead of living on my Social Security now in Costa Rica, I could be living back where all the action is. And getting ready for my next big move.

Instead, I let myself get painted into a corner – and then got kicked out of the nest. It it hadn’t been for Costa Rica, I would be pushing up daisies somewhere.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 361 other followers