Archive for the ‘ Entertainment ’ Category

Gogol and Hollywood Compared

I have read Gogol’s Dead Souls, and I have watched The Apartment - both humorous social satire, and Hollywood falls so short a comparison is not even possible.

Some of you may conclude from this that I am a snob that looks down on popular culture. I will not defend myself from this charge – how can I?

I only hope you can pick of the new translation by the New York Review of Books, and see what really clever social satire – and 19th Century Ukrainian/Russian comedy – is like.

It’s something else.

Sophocles on the Fate of Men

Sometimes poetry says it best, and in ancient Greek plays the actors (wearing masks and heavy robes) recited poetry to the audience. The men in the audience shrieked with terror, and the woman had spontaneous miscarriages on the spot.

The following is from Oedipus the King, translated by David Grene. The Chorus (who had the final say on everything) is speaking:

O generations of men, how I
count you as equal to those who live
not at all!
What man, what man on earth wins more
of happiness than a seeming
and after that turning away?
Oedipus, you are a pattern of this,
Oedipus, you and your fate!
Luckless Oedipus, whom of all men
I envy not at all.

O child of Laius,
would I have never seen you.
I weep for you and cry
a dirge of lamentation.

To speak directly, I drew my breath
from you at the first and so I now I lull
my mouth to sleep with your name.

Compare this with our present mandatory optimism. The Greeks knew much better what the human situation was – which has not changed all that much.

A Clockwork Orange – The Movie

Hollywood knows its viewers are idiots (especially when they are viewing) – and produces movies to please them. This summarizes my review of the movie.

The book was literature of a particular kind: social satire, which the English have specialized in for a long time, and which they do better than anyone else.

The movie is worth a watch, especially after reading the book, so you can see what they left out – which is most of the book.

What they included is explicit sexuality – nudes with elaborate hairdos and big tits at full alert. I got to admit I had to stop the movie and stare at them for awhile. After that shock treatment, the viewers were probably unable to think coherently. Not a single male erection is shown – evidently that is not yet acceptable.

I got to admit the scene where he suffers from the rejection of his parents (suffering is something new to him) was better than the book and helped move the plot along nicely. And the actor who played the writer, who coined the phrase (in the book) A Clockwork Orange, was brilliant.

Other than that, read (or listen to) the book.

March 9 1959 First Barbie Doll

Craig Hill

This is another blogger you should know about. Just keeping up will all his posts is a job in itself. From this posting;

Eleven inches tall, with a waterfall of blond hair, Barbie was the first mass-produced toy doll in the United States with adult features. The woman behind Barbie was Ruth Handler, who co-founded Mattel, Inc. with her husband in 1945. After seeing her young daughter ignore her baby dolls to play make-believe with paper dolls of adult women, Handler realized there was an important niche in the market for a toy that allowed little girls to imagine the future.

Ticos are great imitators, especially of American popular culture. Ticas are big-busted and short, not wasp-waisted and tall – but Ticas (like women everywhere) can easily overlook this.  Barbie images are everywhere.

Ticos also have an inferiority complex, when contrasting themselves with all the affluent countries. But you dare not tell them that.

Cathedral Sunset – Sedona, AZ

Photobotos

I lived for awhile in Sedona, back when I was living mostly out of the back of my pickup truck. I wasn’t taking in pictures back then, just sleeping out in the beautiful country.

The people there, I have to say, were not so beautiful, and I had to ignore them.

The World is a Mess

Few will agree on anything about our present situation, but they will agree that the world is a mess – there is just no better way to describe it.

I am watching the movie Pollock, which I got from Netflix. In a flash of insight I realized what Pollock was doing: his paintings were a mess – deliberately. He was expressing the American Fifties the best way he knew how. From the Wikipedia article:

In a famous 1952 article in ARTnewsHarold Rosenberg coined the term “action painting,” and wrote that “what was to go on the canvas was not a picture but an event. The big moment came when it was decided to paint ‘just to paint.’ The gesture on the canvas was a gesture of liberation from value — political, aesthetic, moral.”

A liberation from value! These words ought to be carved in stone on top of the Washington Monument – with neon lights for nighttime viewing.

I was living in Silicon Valley when the movie came out. This started a search of the Bay area for some of his drip paintings. None were found! As far as the Bay was concerned, Pollock never existed.

I have been to a number of art museums on both coasts, and in Denver when I lived there. I don’t remember seeing any Pollocks. Perhaps the reason is simple: this is part of America’s psyche that it no longer wants to see.

No doubt some will point out that Pollock’s #5, 1948 is the most expensive painting ever sold: $140 million.This, to me, only shows the vast difference between the 99% and the 1% – two different worlds, neither of which makes any sense.

What can you say about a mess, especially if you take it seriously? Perhaps the shock of it would bring us to our senses – but we don’t seem interested in that. Instead we rush on – going in all directions at top speed – carefully avoiding the most important thing we have – our precious Selves. Which, as far as we are concerned, never existed.

Absorbing Idiocy Gratefully

I had an interesting experience at my dentist office yesterday. She doesn’t usually have many clients, but yesterday the office was full of people. After a short while my dentist poked her head out of her operating room and said she had an emergency, and asked if I could wait for 10 minutes? I said sure.

Gradually it became clear that an entire family was involved: the father, who was holding a baby (a unusually intelligent baby that looked at all of us so seriously), the mother, a teen-age daughter and son, two aunts, an uncle, and eventually the grandmother. The uncle had to have a tooth extracted, the daughter had to have some painful work done, and I could hear her screams as her mother tried to comfort her.

This was interesting enough, but what struck me most was the apt attention everyone was paying to the television. The television is on all the time in that office, which had always annoyed me, but I had just ignored it. The shows on it are amazingly stupid, mainly about sex and sports. To my amazement, everyone watched it intently. There was a direct route from that TV to the pleasure center in their brains, and they could not resist it. Their newspapers are the same way: sex, violence, and sports. Idiocy.

Myself, sometime back in the Eighties, I made the decision to not watch television, because I knew it was too overpowering. I wanted to be in control of my mind, not it. This was not a conscious decision that I carefully thought out, it was just a gut reaction to being bossed around by unknown forces beyond my control. I have since realized it was one of my better decisions.

In that dentist’s office I had watched people slowly turn into idiots – without having the slightest idea what was happening to them.

Awakenings

This is a review of the movie, which I got from NetFlix. I first read the book, and was inspired by it – and by its author, Oliver Sacks. I can’t believe he let Hollywood tell his own story – and distort it completely.

In the movie he comes across as a well-meaning idiot – when in fact he is a serious medical researcher – who is also happens to be an excellent writer. It’s about a terminal care institution full of people suffering from sleeping sickness. He treats them with L-DOPA, with very mixed results.

The differences between the screenplay and the book are simply astonishing. Evidently Hollywood thinks its viewers are idiots who don’t believe in science – and treats them accordingly. It may be right – but Hollywood itself has contributed to this mental deterioration.

The result is an abomination, dragging in all kinds of useless sub-plots that emphasize one point: you gotta be helpless in the face of power – the power of Hollywood.

External Forces are Now In Control

What do I mean by this? I mean people are no longer in control of their world – instead, their world controls them. We can no longer imagine what inside forces or internally-directed individuals or social movements, could be. Because these have been destroyed completely. Everyone lives in fear of being discovered – just the opposite of the normal situation.

In this situation it is worthwhile to consider what is real and what is not. Not too long ago this would have been a foolish question: what is is simply what is and it is bombarding us with its presence continuously. But most of these sensory and emotional impacts are no longer felt; we have restricted ourselves to one kind of input: the image on a screen or display.

Everything else is seen as happening on a virtual screen in our minds. Only it is real, and there is nothing behind it. People have become consumers, reacting to these images.

It is instructive to trace this development, which started with the invention of photography in the middle of the 19th Century. Immediately photographs became more real than the reality they imaged. Reality had been condensed into an image on a surface – automatically! This was much better than a painting, which was produced by a human. The external force (a technical process which controlled human events) had made its first appearance.

This was soon combined with printing, and every newspaper had to have its photograph, front and center. One photograph could be reproduced millions of times. This was power! People noticed, and were influenced.

Moving pictures were next – and their influence was hypnotic. People could sit for hours in a darkened theater and watch the image on the silver screen – bigger that life! The addition of sound made it much more powerful – and the lives of their movie stars became more important than their own. The external force had become a world of its own – the real world, as they saw it.

But this was nothing. The advent of television quickly took over – and soon became the new reality – and is still our dominate one. McLuhan said “The medium is the message,” and the medium was the television screen. As far as the public was concerned, there was nothing behind this screen, and this seemed perfectly natural. As far as business was concerned, it was perfect way to manipulate the masses – and they set about doing just that.

But this was nothing, by comparison to what came next – a something that is still happening. The computer/software/internet made a new power structure possible.

Here again, as far as the masses are concerned, everything happens on a magical surface – that of a computer display (preferably a hand-held one).

Behind these displays, powerful (even global) interconnected forces are at work – but they too are controlled by forces they do not understand.

Individuals Make Societies, Societies Make Individuals

Pardon me for saying the obvious, but it needs to be said. This is a two-way street, or at least it should be. The whole idea of a democracy was to make more people part of the government. The built-in tendency is for only a few to be in positions of power.

America is now in the process of transferring power to these few. This is what conservatism (in the American sense) is. Americans have a clear feeling that they are not in control of their country – but they also feel helpless to do anything about it.

This makes them easy prey for social manipulators of all kinds, who make them feel powerful – while they are doing whatever they say, as directed by the media. People like to think they are in power, but hate the work involved; they are lazy – and perfectly willing to let someone else do that for them.

The trend everywhere is towards nominal democracies – with the real power being wielded by a consortium of the rich and powerful, who naturally take charge of everything. Not just the military, but business (which is run just like the military), the government (that they own), the media (that they own also), the educational establishment (which is devoted to serving them) – and, of course, the enforcers: the security/penal institutions where torture of all kinds (especially mental) is becoming more and more common.

Society has almost perfect control over its members. They cannot even imagine challenging it. The levers of power have been cleverly hidden from them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 361 other followers