Archive for the ‘ History ’ Category

Software is Not Magic

Most people think of it is some kind of magic – and sometimes even programmers think of themselves as professional magicians, fooling the audience with their sleight of hand. All software can do is create illusions – but since life is an illusion, what can be the harm in that?

This is exactly what people believed in the Middle Ages: that the world was not real – and the real world was only revealed by the mysteries of the church, and by arduous spiritual practices.

How fortunate we are, when miracles are free, and we don’t even have to miss a meal to get one! All we have to do is believe in this new religion – the religion of unlimited power – and not look under the hood to see what is really going on.

The Worst Mass Slaughter in History

This was not even noticed, because it only occurred in our collective minds; our bodies were not affected – at least not directly. And to make it even more complicated, this slaughter effected a part of us that was part of the modern world – but had also existed in the Greco-Roman world – the autonomous self. The vast majority of the world’s population was not part of the modern world, and was not affected.

Let me clarify that. The modern world transitioned into a post-modern world – while most of the world was aware of neither. And the post-modern world is not aware either – since it refuses to be aware of anything. The pain of this catastrophic loss would be too much for it to bear. And it has responded by killing the world that has killed them.

WikiLeaks on the Coup in Honduras

WikiLeaks - OPEN AND SHUT: THE CASE OF THE HONDURAN COUP

There was a lot of smoke about this event – at the time. Our diplomats there did a remarkable job of analyzing the situation, and reporting back on it. But their valuable information was ignored – as is often the case. Instead, Washington allied itself with the local power elite – not best of people, but people more like them.

The World is a Very Complicated Place

This is difficult for a relatively simple species such as ourselves to accept – let alone understand. From the beginning we have come up with simple explanations for everything – beginning with our universal belief in spirits. And this belief has served us well – I am far from disparaging it. Anything that makes life more understandable, and therefore bearable, is valuable.

But our paleolithic selves have been thrust into a world we can barely understand – where a belief in spirits (even very sophisticated ones) is not adequate. What can we do?

The first step is admitting our ignorance – something we are extremely reluctant to do – since our Christian heritage placed us just a little below the angels. Putting ourselves in another world, where we are almost totally ignorant of almost everything, seems like a catastrophic step backward. This problem, however, only exists in our heads. Our bodies continue to function as always – without the brilliant intelligence we like credit ourselves with.

I just finished a book about John Maynard Keynes by Robert Skidelsky, a major biographer of Keynes, who has idealized him. It told me more about economics than I really wanted to know. But I do remember a point the author made: that Keynes was a real person, much larger than his role as an economist – a profession he was skeptical of. None of followers has been able to grasp this – or his many detractors either. Keynes believed that one of our passions was the reduction of uncertainty - an impossible task. Everything else in economics followed from this simple emotional fact.

The Afterlife

Our views on this have changed considerably from the Ancient world, to the Medieval world, to the Modern world, and now finally in the Post-modern world.

First, the Ancient world. From Poetry Magazine:

The ancients assumed that the dead thought only about the things of this life, that they were always preoccupied remembering the facts of their lives, that they grieved or felt contented depending on what had hurt or pleased them here in life, and so as they saw it—and as Christians do not—this world is mankind’s home, that other world is exile.

The Christians reversed this completely, and saw Heaven as their true home – this world being only a temporary unpleasantness, suitable only as a preparation for the real thing – and also to keep them out of the other place.

The Modern world had ambivalent feelings about the Afterlife, depending on what an individual’s religious beliefs were. Many modern figures, such as Newton, still had strong religious beliefs – and many others rejected them completely – but were usually careful to hide their feelings.

In our Post-modern world, this ambivalence still exists, because religion is in many ways is stronger than ever – and people conform more than ever. But a new belief in Heaven also exists – in our unconscious minds.

We believe Heaven (or Hell) exists right now – and we have no interest, one way or the other, in the Afterlife. As far as we are concerned, the fullness of time has arrived – as created by our marvelous technologies, which perform miracles constantly.

The Politics of Poetry

This morning during breakfast I also tried to dine on poetry. I picked up Poetry Magazine and looked at the section Ruth Lilly Poetry Fellows. Five poets were selected as fellows and awarded fellowships of $15,000 each. I looked at their poems but found them unpalatable. “How on earth did they get selected?” I wondered. I knew the answer immediately: politics were involved.

The Poetry Foundation received millions of dollars from the rich heiress Ruth Lilly, and evidently they have used it to set up their own poetry establishment.

I gave up, and read from John Neihardt’s The Twilight of the Sioux. It was about a fight between the American Army and and the Plains Indians – where the Indians lured a calvary troop into a ambush and slaughtered them. I found this interesting.

The Party System Has Been the Curse of Democracy

I am tempted to make that statement even stronger: the party system has destroyed democracy. It is a parasite on democracy and diverts precious social resources from it. Instead of concentrating on finding the right people for the job, enormous energy is used by the parties in their own interests. They take power away from the nation and make it weaker.

Of course everyone asks “How else can democracy work?” For people in the age of the Internet to ask that question only shows how helpless and ignorant they have become. The only answer can be that “Democracy, in most societies, simply doesn’t work very well – and America, the slave of a two-party system, is proof of that.”

That fact that Americans think they have a democracy – and their democracy is the right one for other countries, such as Iraq and Afghanistan – only shows how little they know – of their own country and of other countries.

America did not begin with a party system. The Founding Fathers referred to them derisively as factions – and thought it in poor taste for a man to campaign for public office. The proper man, such as George Washington, would be obvious to the electorate, and he would accept the office out of a sense of public duty – not in order to increase his personal power.

Thomas Jefferson, a very complex person, could not resist this temptation however, and formed the first political party in order to become president – to the complete disgust of John Adams. All the rest has been downhill.

The Urge to Destroy the World

This urge is nothing new, it must be one of the fundamental urges of the human race – along with its opposite: the urge to create a new one. History is nothing but the history of the rise and fall of empires – of optimism and pessimism. As Shakespeare said “Full of sound and fury, but signifying nothing.”

But death, whether the death of an individual or of any group of people, is awful to contemplate – and part of its fascination. Things get so bad sometimes that destroying everything seems the best way out.

Jesus himself – and I am speaking of the historical Jesus here, and not the Christian myth – was an apocalyptic preacher. And as a practical matter, the end of the Jewish nation was at hand – and in their bones they knew it.

In the same way, Americans know their end is at hand. And they are determined to help it along.

This is part of the end of the modern world, which began with WWI – the greatest carnage the world had ever seen. After contemplating it, Freud decided there must be a Death Instinct. The British Empire vanished in WWII. The USSR vanished overnight – to the amazement of everyone – except those inside it who where well aware of its rot. Now it is the turn of the American Empire – with the vigorous assistance of the American people, who are sick of its rot.

Now that I have said this, it seems so simple I wonder I never thought of it before – or why I never put it so simply before. It is simply a matter of life or death – and some situations call for each. We know what our destiny is – why put it off?

A World Hostile to Human Values

This is a follow-up to my posting Humans Can Become Inhuman, which no one seems to have understood. In it, I pointed out that humans have frequently acted inhumanly towards their fellow humans – treating them as though they were a foreign species – and killing them ruthlessly in large numbers – as described in another posting Much Worse Than the Holocaust.

The proper attitude is to regard these incidents as regrettable exceptions to the onward march of human progress. My attitude is that they were only the tip of a much larger iceberg – one where human society was in the process of turning against itself – of becoming not only inhuman, but anti-human.

I hope this makes my position clear. It should be obvious that I am paranoid – but I think my paranoia is reasonable, given the circumstances. Part of this reasonableness is due to theory behind it – which I will now outline.

First of all, social inequality has been part of human society since the beginnings of civilization. A few always got the most – and the people that supported these few, who made things actually work, lived comfortably – and the rest (the vast majority) barely survived. This was life.

The modern world had different ideals. It was in favor of egalitarianism, of making life good for everyone – not just for a few. What a shocking idea! But strangely enough it had power, and changed the way the world worked. For one thing, it changed the way people looked at the world, and made Science possible. But above all, it introduced (or re-introduced from the ancient world, actually) the idea of humanism – which stressed the importance of the autonomous individual – or in contemporary terms: human values.

This development soon forked along two lines – humanist values became liberal values – which were opposed to a new complex of technology-assisted totalitarianism – in American called conservatism. This is the new power which has taken over the human race. Its ascendancy has been gradual – over a hundred years in the process – and so subtle few have noticed it. Its takeover greatly accelerated after WWII with the introduction of Television, Computers, and the Internet. This new world seemed so superior to our human world, we concentrated on it – and even became hostile to the human world we had loved before.

This was a very complicated process, but it results can be easily summarized – humans have been eliminated – or actually, so greatly weakened as to become negligible. From being all-powerful they have become powerless, or helpless. Liberalism, the movement that supported them, became powerless also. How did this happen?

I believe it was the overall impact of technology, which seemed to be more wonderful than anything human. The simple fact that humans were the ones who made all this technology was conveniently overlooked. Technology itself became the new god – especially when it was allied with the power structure – which quickly made it part of itself. This was a new kind of power – much more powerful than any before it. It could control people, using the social sciences – as though they were putty in its hands – or puppets moved by invisible strings.

People themselves became nothing. Human values ceased to exist.

Humans Can Become Inhuman

This ability is one of our strangest characteristics – and one we least like to acknowledge. But of all our shortcomings it is our most serious. Without realizing it, we can easily become evil.

Who we are depends on our social circumstances, and as these change, we change. This change in us changes our social circumstances (it hardly needs to be said) and this feedback produces rapid, unpredictable results – which may be good or bad. Almost all of this goes on unconsciously. We are usually unaware of what is going on at any deep levels – and for some reason avoid such awareness – even though this awareness is vital for the survival of our species.

In summary, we are not the benevolent rational beings we like to think we are – but an unstable mixture of good and bad, driven by forces beyond our comprehension. And this instability is getting worse, not better.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 364 other followers