Archive for the ‘ Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan ’ Category

Addicted to Hate

I keep searching for something that will explain everything – or at least a big part of everything. And it seems to me that hatred explains a lot.

Hatred is a subtle emotion that can become addictive. We do not realize how dangerous it is, or how common it has become. Love, by contrast, has become difficult – and even seems dangerous.

I spent some time reading the Sept 27 issue of the New York Review. Keeping up with this is an education in itself – but a pleasant education, since you can chose what to read.

Although I get a preview of every issue sent to me online, I still get more out of looking at paper, marker pen in hand. But the online version (you need a subscription to view the whole thing) does allow you to make copies of text you want to refer to. Such as this from The Return of ‘The Runaway General’

Many journalists and commentators have predicted that war will break out once the Americans leave [Afghanistan]. The simple but startling outcome of the NATO summit in Chicago in May was that there is apparently no “Plan B.” Every source I have consulted has made it clear that there are no contingency plans if the promised withdrawal of Western forces by 2014 becomes very difficult to carry out; if US and NATO efforts to stabilize and strengthen the Afghan regime fail; if efforts to reduce rising ethnic tensions between the Pashtuns and non-Pashtuns are unsuccessful; if the 350,000-strong Afghan army and police do not hold together; if neighboring states like Pakistan and Iran step up their battle for influence; and if Pakistan does not stop giving sanctuary to the Taliban. A lot of things have to go right before the withdrawal can be seen as successful. On the other hand, only a few things have to go wrong to turn it into a debacle.

Do Americans care? No, most Americans do not read the Review. They are satisfied with hating the Taliban – even though they have no idea what it is. If some magical way were available to eliminate Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran (plus a few other Islamic trouble-makers) instantly – Americans would not hesitate to demand its use.

I hesitate to recommend the next article The Tragedy if the European Union and How to Resolve It, by George Soros because it is so long. I think it would be reasonable to state that the formation of the EU was a matter of love (self-love, perhaps, but still love) and its destruction is a matter of hate – or at least a disinterest on the part of the rich countries of the EU for the poor countries.

Perhaps the EU had benevolent intentions when it admitted these countries – perhaps. But it did not realize what problems this would entail. And once these problems became apparent, it (mainly Germany, that is) could not resolve them – largely because it didn’t want to.

Now for the book It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. Here again, Americans are not interested. This is about reality, and they are no longer interested in that:

As they say, the “the most powerful potential leverage in any democracy is the ability of the citizenry to ‘throw the bums out,’” but the reality is that “during difficult times such as the present, [voters] tend to broadly condemn Washington or Congress, which is more likely to reinforce the structural dynamics that produce gridlock than to generate a constructive call to action.”

The prose is too academic for my taste, but I cannot argue with its conclusion.

China comes in for its share of attention too, in China’s Lost Decade. China was once regarded as the country that could do no wrong (economically, at least) – but now seems to be doing everything wrong.

And closer to home Mexico at War. My family has close ties to Mexico, we used drive there all the way from Illinois for every year-end vacation. It was a nice place to vacation then, and I developed a deep liking for the people.

I can hardly believe how bad it is now – only fifty years later! And much the same could be said about Guatemala and Honduras. Their problems are partly their own – but they were made much worse by their big neighbor to the north.

America was not interested in helping them – only in using them. This attitude cannot be described as hatred – but was something close to it.

The Satanic Verses, the Fatwa, and a Life Changed

The New Yorker

I have to give the New Yorker credit for putting this online without restrictions. I am also listening to The Receptionist: An Education at The New Yorker, which is an education for me.

Beth and I lived in Manhattan for awhile in the Sixties, and we greatly enjoyed it. It was not expensive at the time, but I cannot imagine living there now. We often ate at a Lebanese restaurant, but it deteriorated as the conditions in Lebanon deteriorated.

The Middle East is the cradle of civilization, and it is shocking how much it has changed – for the worse.

General Petraeus and the Drone War

Truthout

I try to protect my readership from too much information, the bane of our time. But this article is well-worth reading. Americans want a magic-bullet, and drone warfare appears to be just that. “Identify the bad-guys and cut their heads off!” If the heads grow back, cut them off again.

I compare it to the bombing campaigns in WWII. They didn’t work, but no one (especially the public) would not believe that and they continued to believe in bombing until the end of the Vietnam War.

The switch to the War on Terror (actually a return to the war against Islam) led to “smart” tactics – which avoided any analysis of what was actually a conflict between cultures.

One can even go back to the American Civil War – which was also a war between cultures.

History repeats itself.

Ghost Wars

Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001

I’m a fussy reader and listener, but I think I will be listening to this for quite a while longer – over 30 hours more, actually – which at 30 minutes a day means 60 days listening. On a good day I might get an hour in, listening to more stupidity and violence. And thanking my lucky stars I am nowhere close to it.

Back in the late Seventies, when I was traveling in Southeast Asia, low-budget travelers like me included Iran and Afghanistan in their itinerary. I repeat: Iran and Afghanistan! And of the two Afghanistan was the favorite. The people were wonderful, everyone said. And they even said the same about Iraq! Although that seemed off the beaten track at the time.

This book is about how that world ended. And how America (and nearly everyone else) made it end.

Mumbai Terror Attack Group Lashkar e Tayyiba Now More Dangerous Than Al Qaeda

The Daily Beast

The Daily Beast started showing up on in my inbox, along with many others, and I look at it once in awhile. It seems to have some good stuff – but this article hit me right between the eyeballs.

The Mumbai attack happened four years ago, and the intelligence community is just now figuring out what it meant:

It marked the maturation of LeT from a Punjabi-based Pakistani terror group targeting India exclusively to a member of the global Islamic jihad targeting the enemies of al Qaeda: the Crusader West, Zionist Israel, and Hindu India.

This article also shows the moxie of the alternative media compared to the establishment kind. Here is the author’s bio:

Bruce Riedel, a former longtime CIA officer, is a senior fellow in the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution. At President Obama’s request, he chaired the strategic review of policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2009. He is author of the book Deadly Embrace: Pakistan, America and the Future of the Global Jihad and The Search for Al Qaeda: Its Leadership, Ideology and Future.

Solid credentials, no?

Why Iran Should Get the Bomb

Foreign Affairs

I don’t blog much about foreign affairs, but I am on the mailing list for the Foreign Affairs magazine. This posting caught my eye – for obvious reasons.

America and Israel (and the Religious Right, which identifies strongly with it)  are willing to go to war with Iran to stop it from getting The Bomb, – none of which makes any sense.

How Pakistan Makes Washington Pay for the Afghan War

TomDispatch

I deliberately concentrate on events close to home. But sometimes something really amazing drops into my inbox. Such as this:

The following ingredients should go a long way to produce a political thriller. Mr. M, a jihadist in an Asian state, has emerged as the mastermind of a terrorist attack in a neighboring country, which killed six Americans. After sifting through a vast cache of intelligence and obtaining a legal clearance, the State Department announces a $10 million bounty for information leading to his arrest and conviction.  Mr. M promptly appears at a press conference and says, “I am here. America should give that reward money to me.”

A State Department spokesperson explains lamely that the reward is meant for incriminating evidence against Mr. M that would stand up in court. The prime minister of M’s home state condemns foreign interference in his country’s internal affairs. In the midst of this imbroglio, the United States decides to release $1.18 billion in aid to the cash-strapped government of the defiant prime minister to persuade him to reopen supply lines for U.S. and NATO forces bogged down in the hapless neighboring Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.

Mr. M. is Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, a 62-year-old former academic with a tapering, hennaed beard, and the founder of the Lashkar-e Taiba (the Army of the Pure, or LeT), widely linked to several outrageously audacious terrorist attacks in India. The LeT was formed in 1987 as the military wing of the Jammat-ud Dawa religious organization (Society of the Islamic Call, or JuD) at the instigation of the Pakistani army’s formidable intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The JuD owes its existence to the efforts of Saeed, who founded it in 1985 following his return to his native Lahore after two years of advanced Islamic studies in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, under the guidance of that country’s Grand Mufti, Shaikh Abdul Aziz bin Baz.

Does any of this interest Americans? No. They are only interested in what the official media is telling them – and it is not telling them anything like this.

To put this in a larger context – this is part of the destruction of America – which is happening, sure enough – but is not recognized.

Our War Against the Pashtuns

NY Review

I am not too interested in what is going on in Afghanistan, but this is the best summary I have seen. It’s not even that hard to read – once you set your mind to it.

Americans should read it – but of course they won’t. They only believe what they see on TV.

War is Still the Way Business Gets Done in the World

This is a quote from the article The Warrior Class: A Golden Age for the Free-Lance Soldier, by Charles Glass in the April Harper’s Magazine. It is not online yet.

As I keep saying: we now have an unprecedented amount of information available to us – but few are reading it. This article should have caused a sensation, but it has not even been noticed.

It describes how private security forces are now a permanent part of the world’s military. The author clearly knows his subject, and for me it is fascinating reading. Being a professional solder – or better yet, being an employee of one of firms hiring them: Private Security Firms (PSCs), private-military companies (PMCs), or Private Security Providers (PSPs) is now where it is at.

These functionaries are faceless nobodies with no moral compunctions at all. I worked with them when I worked for the military (Army, Navy, Air Force). These experiences almost drove me out of my mind – but did not bother them, because they had no minds.

The American public should be ashamed of hiring them – but they too have no minds.

This article describes the military situation in Afghanistan much better than anything I have read. Our presence there is pure hypocrisy – a fact of life that I was born into, and lived with all my working life.

Interwoven with the main story was another one it took me some time to disentangle: the history of Ashraf Ghani, who the author knew when they studied together at the American University of Beirut in 1972. He has an impeccable record of integrity, and the US should have backed him – but as usual, it did not. He is now an official in the Afghan government, trying to oust the foreign military contractors. If he fails, to quote from the article:

It will show that a small country dependent on American arms for the survival of its government cannot exercise sovereignty over the private military industry.

What we have now is the increasing privatization of the world’s militaries. With industry getting more and more of the action – a situation that has existed ever since WWII.

Women, democracy and dictatorship

Open Democracy

Here is the summary:

In the early and middle decades of the twentieth century it was always dictators who embarked on policy and legislation which liberated and empowered women in both family and society. The dictators liberated women in the good days, but retreated under pressure, and it was the populists ushered in by ‘democracy’ who oppressed women.

In Islamic countries, democracy now means the rule of Islamic law, and the suppression of women.

The article was written by an intellectual, and as such is much too verbose. But the photos say the same thing more more concisely. Note, in the third photo, the women on the left wearing sunglasses, but with her blouse unbuttoned down over the top of her bra.

I have been paying some attention to classical art, where women are shown either modestly clothed or completely topless – with nothing in between. The only exception, of course were women of doubtful virtue – and women now are fond of imitating them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 362 other followers