Archive for the ‘ Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan ’ Category

In Washington, Fear the Silence, Not the Noise

Tomgram

This is a blog, and one of a blog’s functions is to call attention to other good things on the Net.

This posting on Tomgram is outstanding. I worked for the Military for quite a while, as a civilian, and I saw things no one would believe – waste and corruption on a vast scale.

I also had a personal friend from my childhood days who was a huge success working in the Pentagon. He never questioned what was going on, saw no further than he was supposed to, and made himself indispensable to the top brass.

For my part, I went out of my way to overlook this, and we remained friends. His life since then has fallen apart, along with many of my other friends, but I simply make sure to stay out of their self-destructive way.

Why Were the Marines in Haiti?

My father became a Marine, because of the Depression. He served from 1930 to 1934, most of that time in Haiti. I have always wondered what the Marines were doing there – and assumed it was to protect American business interests, but could find nothing to substantiate this.

I just bought Haiti: the Aftershock of History by Larent Dubois. I was mainly interested in the American occupation, which lasted for twenty years, from1915 to 1935. It’s main purpose was to support what we now call agrobusiness – but at the time it was just an extension of the plantation system, producing the same crop: sugar. This is almost a drug, and one the world can never get enough of – but also one with a huge supply, so prices are always low – exactly what consumers want.

My father told us what he was told say – that America was there to help Haiti. And this was partly true – roads were built which benefited everyone – but were intended mostly to help the large plantations that were acquired (by various means) from the natives.

My father was not a typical Marine – he took advantage of his time there to learn French – and to develop a romantic relationship with his French teacher’s daughter (much to the horror of his family back in Iowa). I was surprised to learn from the book that the majority of Haitians speak Kreyòl, and only a small minority could read or understand French.

No wonder the family Dad became involved with considered themselves superior – also because of their light skin, which they took care to shade from the sun. To my eternal distress, Dad abandoned his Haitian girlfriend, who loved him – and married my mother who do not. Dad lived under a lot of stress and didn’t even make it to sixty. After he died, we discovered that Dad and his Haitian girlfriend had carried on a passionate correspondence, in French – while Dad was married, and which only ended when I was born in 1936.

To Dad’s credit, he enjoyed living in an poor country – because it was more personal, I think. Which was strange, because he was not a social person. I am the same way – I retired in Costa Rica because its people were friendly – even though I am an not a social person either.

But I want to return to the effect of America on Haiti – which was not beneficial, obviously. The same was true of our effect on the Philippines. The President at the time actually got down on his knees and prayed about it. And received the assurance that America should bless the Filipinos with our presence. The effect there has been similar – they will probably never recover from being a colony of ours.

The same could be said of any colonial power – British, French, German, Holland (in Indonesia), even Belgium (in the Belgium Congo).  The effect was always baleful – often horribly so.

I hardly need add America’s influence on Vietnam, Iraq, and now Afghanistan.

We Should Try to Understand Iran

Open Democracy - The Iran complex: why history matters

Americans have always been uninterested in the rest of the world – as far as they are concerned, only they matter. This attitude has gotten them into trouble, over and over. We ignored what was going on in Germany and Japan in the Thirties – and the result was WWII. We won that war, and we concluded from it – that ignorance followed by war was the best solution for any international problem.

Iran is now an international problem – and our reaction to it has been the same – ignore them, and then threaten to blow them off the map if they become a problem. That this is stupid does not bother Americans – for them it is just business as usual, our usual combination of ignorance and violence.

For those who would rather understand the situation, however, I recommend the article.

Iran hijacked US drone, says Iranian engineer

Christian Science Monitor - link from Slashdot

This is some high-tech trivia – but that is one of my interests, and may be one of your also. It is not too hard to exploit our cyber weaknesses, as many a virus writer has discovered.

More and more warfare has become cybertech warfare – where more is happening behind the scenes that in from of it. More than ever, it does not pay to have enemies – but we seem more interested in making them more hostile to us, rather than in making them less hostile.

The ordinary citizen was helpless before, but is now doubly helpless. He just hopes some missile doesn’t shoot his britches off.

Thoughts From a Thoughtful Solder

NY Times - On War and Redemption

Yes these do exist, in spite of the military’s strenuous efforts to remove all ability to think from them.

It’s not the sights, sounds, adrenaline and carnage of war that linger. It’s the morality.  We did evil things, maybe necessary evil, but evil nonetheless. It’s not the Taliban we killed that bother me. They knew as well as I did what can happen when you pick up a gun and try to kill your enemies.  But the enemy isn’t the only one who dies in war.

It’s your morality.

But after so many wars, and the prospect of an endless number in the future, Americans have grown numb to the idea – and simply head for the nearest shopping mall.

War as a Way of Life

The Everywhere War

War is not a way of life, it is a way of death and any people who become obsessed with it are doomed. However, this is exactly the situation in America, as this article describes in overwhelming detail.

This is a huge article, far more than I have time for. The Af-Pak part is probably the most relevant. But, somewhat to my surprise, I find I have already lost interest in that war. America seems determined to be at war somewhere, and I am fast losing interest in them. I suspect this is true of most Americans: another war is just another war, much like any other. American itself has been destroyed, and all this other stuff is just smoke.

I have been amazed that terrorist organizations have not focused on more damage to America’s infrastructure. 9/11 was a sophisticated attack, but other attacks, such as those on our electrical distribution system, could be performed easily and would have a devastating effect.

Evidently, terrorist organizations prefer to attack military targets in their own countries. These require almost no training or equipment and their effect is immediate and gratifying. A suicide bomber is a weapon hard to match.

Back to the Future – The American Way of Bombing

Open Democracy – The American Way of Bombing

America has always been infatuated with bombing – even though its effectiveness has not been all that impressive. The idea of killing remotely while we stay safe at home has been irresistible. The shock of 9/11 was mainly the shock of losing this security.

This Open Democracy article is long and technical – but informative, something all Americans should know, but are not interested in knowing (they don’t have the time for it, they claim, even though their future is at stake.)

If this is a dismal case of ‘back to the future’, we could do worse than attend to the voices from the past. Critics were concerned at the expansion of the physical space of war and the contraction of the moral space of war.  Military violence would know no global limits and the distinctions between combatants and civilians would be dissolved.  In the case of the electronic battlefield, there was a fear that abstraction would reach a terrifying climax through automation: ‘Ultimately we can have the machines fighting the “target signatures” with no human beings involved on either side.’14 One appalled Senator complained that US ground troops were being withdrawn only to leave behind ‘an automated war’, and he quoted Noam Chomsky: ‘We intend to turn the land of Vietnam into an automated murder machine.’  Other commentators worried that the Pentagon planned to extend its ‘lethal pinball machine’ to the whole world, which, ‘if wired right, could become a great maze of circuitry and weaponry, a jungle from which those who walk off the straight line from home to office to store would be eliminated.’

This appears to be well-researched by Derek Gregory, with plenty of footnotes. His online book The Everywhere War can be viewed here.

This is part of the larger picture I keep writing about: the overwhelming importance of technology in our lives – including the technology of war that continues to infatuate us.

Modern Warfare can no Longer Save the Economy

It one time it could – WWII brought the world out of the Recession with a bang – and made a huge impression on that world. This overlooked a few important details: Germany, Italy, and Japan were destroyed completely – but, being the victor, we could overlook things like that. Great Britain didn’t do so well either – but we could overlook that too.

War, we were convinced, was the way to go!

Now, a few unsuccessful wars later – including, above all the Cold War – we have yet to learn that war can no longer save the economy – but destroys it instead.

What is our vast military and our ever-continuing wars for? Perhaps to cover up our declining power overall.

America Prefers Corrupt Governments

10 years on and life grim for Afghans

I usually don’t pay much attention to the news, but this Yahoo News story caught my eye when I logged on this morning. I had been wondering about this very problem: when Americans control a country the result is rampant corruption.

The outstanding example in my mind is Haiti, where my father in 1930, a young man unable to find work in the depression, joined the Marines – and was sent to occupy the country. The result was not democracy and affluence, but some of the most repressive regimes in history, and some of the worst poverty too.

Americans accept no responsibility for this, and claim the result was not their doing, but the fault of the Haitian people themselves. Somehow they are inferior stuff and naturally end up in bad circumstances of their own making. Except the same thing happened in the Philippines. When we took over there, we violently suppressed their incipient democracy, and destroyed their chances for success forever.

Democracy is a fragile growth, and needs careful nurturance. What happens instead is that American business interests take over and promote corruption because it allows them to exploit the people. American liberals have been helpless to stop this. And the pattern has been repeated in country after country: Vietnam, Iraq, and now Afghanistan.

A cynic could say America simply intended to destroy these countries – and it would be hard to refute this. The rule here is simple: pay attention to what people do, not what they say – because people lie so easily.

Part of the problem is the inability of Americans to understand other people – a trait they inherited from Great Britain and the British Empire. Their solution has always been to make others like them – or actually like America really is, a fake democracy run by business interests.

This is part of something I have been writing about (and totally ignored): the anti-humanism of post-modern society. The human race is self-destructing – and is completely unable to see this.

Iraq Learned About Democracy the Hard Way

NY Times - From a Few Iraqis, a Word to Libyans on Liberation

Our neoconservatives had the bright idea that all we had to do was occupy Iraq and it would automatically absorb democracy from the experts: us. Filipinos, however, reminded us of their experience with an American occupation. And the same was true of Vietnam. Both of them ended up much worse off.

A cynic could say that America’s goal in any of its occupations was to destroy the occupied country – much like Great Britain did before them – or for that matter, the Soviet Union.

That democracy succeeded in the West was a historical accident. And it is not working well now in American, England, or France – to put it mildly. Almost every country in the world is a nominal democracy – a democracy in name only. And most of them are a farce – with real power residing in their local power elite (the corporations, in the case of the US).

Iraq’s case is especially tragic; it was the most advanced of all the Islamic countries. Sunnis and Shia lived in harmony, it not equality; it’s women were wearing mini-skirts, alcohol and a Christian minority were tolerated, and it had an affluent, highly educated middle class. Also the world’s second-largest oil reserves. All of this fell apart when the Americans arrived, and it may never recover.

Does America have any regrets? Not that I am aware of.

It still retains the right to destroy any country any time it wants to. It has become a failed state; eager to export its failures.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 364 other followers