Archive for the ‘ Morality ’ Category

Law and Disorder

Now that I have just written Superior People are Above the Law, I look at my inbox and see this Newegg nukes “corporate troll” Alcatel in third patent appeal win this year.

I had to read it carefully to figure out what it was saying – the average person will not even try. But I can summarize it for you:

Clever legal firms hired by greedy companies – and deliberately incompetent courts are eating our lunch.

I have a brother who was a successful lawyer and a partner in a law firm. He started off as an idealistic young lawyer – and ended up as a disillusioned (and seriously depressed) person – having no idea where his depression came from.

He had became a success – but lost his soul. A situation guaranteed to make you depressed.

Superior People are Above the Law

Morality has always been a difficult business – but with the collapse of the Modern world, at the end of the 19th Century, we decided it was too difficult to bother with – and decided to do without it.

Society is now composed of special interest groups, each of which has the right to determine what is right for it – and the rest of the world too. In one hundred years (in the 20th Century) we have regressed back to a morality of the Middle Ages. And we feel this has been a big improvement.

As an American child of the second half of that century, I was right in the middle of this mess – and could not figure out what was going on. Now that I have the time, and the distance, to think it over – I can only marvel at what happened. And marvel at how ignorant we continue to be.

The closest parallel I can think of was the Fall of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. But the parallel is not very exact because the decline this time was covered up by the rampant innovation of technology after technology – which cleverly covered up what was really going on. Which was a moral, as well as a social – collapse.

This is best illustrated by an industry I know very well – since I worked in it for twenty years – what we now call the Computer industry – which is really a complex consisting of hardware, software – and the Internet and the Wireless networks. Bear with me as I go into this.

As I said, I was part of that industry – and I suffered from it. Which was strange, because no one else seemed to be suffering. They were happily destroying destroying whatever company they were in – and seemed to be intent on destroying everything else.

This can be seen most clearly in the fastest-growing part of the industry – what they call the mobile part – hand-held devices. It is turning out junk at an incredible rate. And their customers (which have included me) are unable to tell the difference.

But now that I have a number of their useless products cluttering up my desk – I have decided to revolt. My latest purchase – which was downloadable software, would not install, and I complained to the seller. They said they were only distributors for the product, and I would have to complain to the manufacturer – which I did – and got no response from their customer support, which seemed to be turned off.

Now I am demanding my money back – and reminding them that, since it was a credit card purchase, I can get my bank to make a refund for me. This will be a hassle, and take time – and they are banking (literally) on my not going to the trouble. But this time they are wrong – I am going to get my money back from the bastards if it takes me all year.

But for a lot of their stuff, customers have no defense against inadequate products or services. They take the money and run – leaving the customer holding the bag. And the Internet has made this much easier, since it has made them invisible.

Now, after that long digression, I can return to the subject I started on – how Superior People are above the law. How entire industries – all kinds of special interest groups – the rich and the powerful – are now above the Law. And this is helped by our latest technology (including TV and the Internet) – which seem to encourage immorality.

Now I want to go back to WWII in America. The event that made America the most powerful nation in history – and, as it turned out, one of the most immoral – although that immorality was rather complicated – as I have indicated.

My parents, which were typical of their generation, considered themselves superior people – in fact, they were obsessed with this. Which meant, in plain language, that they were terrible parents – and lied to their children in all kinds of ways.

I ended up being an engineer and an integral part of this bed of lies. And thoroughly miserable.

I will be writing more about this – especially how my parents brought this on.

Being and Doing

These are two different things, but we tend to confuse them. We should consider their differences carefully (there are advantages to both ways) – but we seem to be determined not to think about them at all.

The basics are simple – being is organic, a part of life. Doing is mechanical, a matter of developing a routine, and then following it. This routine is usually unconscious and socially dependent – but it is mechanical – and very difficult to stop.

Being allows us to be emotional and socially interactive. Doing allows us to get things done. This fine balance was permanently disrupted when we got more emotional satisfaction from doing than from being.

The practice of meditation is very useful in helping us tell the difference. Once we get the mind quieted down (no small task) we can feel what is going on in our bodies and our minds (really the same thing).

Why don’t more people meditate? Because they don’t want their being to interfere with their doing – which is what they want to do to the exclusion of everything else. They want to be human doings.

Almost everyone will agree, in theory, that we should be more human – more compassionate and considerate. But in practice they behave entirely differently. And are completely unable to notice this.

This is our problem – not that we don’t have fine ideals – but that we have become so unaware, we cannot tell if we are following them or not.

This is, it seems to me – is a deliberate policy. We are the exact opposite of what we think we are. And this, we think, is very clever of us.

When, in fact, it is very stupid of us – because we have destroyed ourselves.

Our Historical Nightmare

In reading a book about Foucault, I find this quote from Max Weber:

The mighty cosmos of the modern economic order..the iron cage [in which] specialists without spirit, sensualists without heart [are] caught in the delusion that [they] have achieved a level of development never before attained by mankind.

A footnote says this is from Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

I would only add that he was referring to the post-modern world – since he wrote this in 1905. However this difference would not become apparent until after WWI. And would accelerate after WWII. And eventually lead to an economic (and moral) collapse.

Which has already happened – although the full impact of this has yet to be felt.

We Can Do Whatever We Want To – To You

Harper’s Magazine – The Age of Cruelty - subscribers only.

I don’t have to tell you what the people are here – in canine terms, the top-dogs and the under-dogs. Those in authority, and those without. Plenty of other terms can be used also – those in power, and those who have none. Those who can dish it out, and those who have to take it – often in more sexually explicit terms. And let’s face it – parents and their helpless children.

And the long list of conquers and the conquered – the rich and the poor. Americans and whoever their enemy is at the moment.

The Harper’s article, by Jeff Madrick, is priceless, and is almost worth the price of a subscription. Here are some excerpts:

The center-left historian Sean Wilentz has called the period from 1974 to 2008 and Age of Reagan. In his book of that title, Wilentz expresses his grudging admiration for how our fortieth president transformed the nation. “Reagan,” writes Wilentz, “embodied a new form of deeply conservative politics with some of the rhetoric and even a bit of the spirit of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and John F. Kennedy’s New Frontier.” But this embrace of progressive rhetoric and spirit did not reflect Reagan’s damaging policies, a fact Wilentz can’t help but document. A more accurate name for Wilentz’s book – and for the era – might be the Age of Cruelty.

The reverence  in which Americans of all political persuasion seem to hold for Reagan today is absurd. As president he created a phony – if romantic – picture of America’s past, a schoolboy’s fiction of a country forged by individualism. From this fiction came the dream that we could return to an earlier moral order in which Americans were supposedly freer. Of course, America was in part built by government investment in canals and railroads, in public water and urban sanitation systems, in highways, scientific research, free K-12 education, college subsidies, and a legal system that encouraged competition while protecting private property. If Reagan brought Americans optimism, it was optimism based on false hopes and misleading facts.

In his final debate with Jimmy Carter before the 1980 election, Reagan said “We don’t have inflation because the people are living too well. We have inflation because the government is living too well.” Americans apparently found this thinking convincing. He had given them as easy scapegoat for their growing frustrations: Washington. In the process he redefined our relationship to our government, making Americans consumers rather than citizens. They paid taxes not to help others, it seemed, but to buy something for themselves. If the individual benefit wasn’t apparent, the money should be withheld.

I saw this in one company I worked for in Silicon Valley. It had been founded by an immigrant who had arrived in America with twenty dollars in his pockets. He had built a highly-successful company (Adaptec). Before he retired, he wanted to pay America back for his success – so he became president of the United Way for the Valley. My fellow-workers were indignant – they were not going to give any of their hard-earned money to the poor! The poor would have to take care of themselves – if they could.

They were in the business of getting as much money as they could – as fast as they could – by destroying the company. Which they proceeded to do. And no one thought this was unusual or remarkable.

Cruelty had become normal.

A Grim Life

I marvel when I look back on my working life – how grim it was. It was focused on two things – making money and spending money! That was a grim existence.

But we were absolutely convinced that was the only proper life. Destroying the world by making money off of it. Any other kind of life was unthinkable.

Not that we did much thinking. We lived by our instincts alone – and they were all about money, in one form or another. Living for any other reason was treasonous – and was punished by a fate worse then death – being unemployed and unemployable. Which meant not being able to live at all.

Having been in that condition – and recovering from it – has been the story of my life. I am very much a person of the 21st Century – marveling at my life I led (if I could call it that) in the 20th Century. It was as weird as any life could possibly be – but to us it seemed perfectly normal.

Here I have to make my usual disclaimer – and remark on the huge difference between conscious and unconscious behavior. This, it seems to me, is the one thing we need to get clearer on. We went through a big change when we went from Modern life to Post-modern life – a change that happened sometime between the mid-19th Century and the mid-20th Century – marked by WWI and WWII.

We become a different kind of people – a kind we did not like – so we moved these people into our unconscious – individual and collective. Where they could operate autonomously – allowing our conscious selves to claim themselves innocent of their horrible behavior.

Any recovery (if there is any) will have to acknowledge this very basic fact. The fact that we have become liars on a vast scale – and have become unable to notice this.

We even have a technology that allows us to embody this – we have become our computers – a complex of hardware, software – and the Internet and the Wireless networks. And the industry that serves them – which I was in for 20 years. We have insisted that they take over our lives. Just as we had insisted that our cars take over our lives.

We have insisted on being helpless. A grim life indeed.

How Android Really Works

I’m amazed it took me so long to figure this out – when the evidence was staring me right in the face – two Android 4.0 touch devices lying on my desk that I cannot make work – and never will be able to make work.

Android is not an operating system for mobile devices – as everyone assumes – it is a collection of software components that can be used by manufacturers – plus a few software components of their own – plus the right hardware – to make a mobile device. This is not easy, and it takes some first-rate engineering (which is not cheap) to produce a quality product.

It is up to the manufacturers to make something that will work. Often they don’t bother – they just buy some marginal hardware (from the first-rate manufacturers) – add a few Android software components so it almost works – and then sell it cheaply as an Android device.

The old adage “Let the buyer beware” no longer applies. These products are so complicated, and do so much, the average user is in no position to evaluate them. The expert user, who knows what is going on under the hood of these devices, will highlight the problems he is interested in. And overlook the rest.

In short, the high-tech world is breaking down – and like Humpty-Dumpty, cannot be put back together again.

How to be Evil Without Even Trying

At one time, to be evil (or to be anything, actually) you had to do something. Not any more – to be evil, you do not have to do anything at all – but be exactly like everyone else. You will be evil to a degree previously unimaginable.

Will this bother you? Probably not. But here we have to distinguish between your conscious self and your unconscious self. There is tons of philosophizing out there (some of it mine) that neglects this vital difference.

Perhaps at one time we did not have an unconscious. It was not necessary. Deceit was common enough, but the means for coping with it were common too. People were simply people – both good and bad – and everybody knew that very well.

But in Freud’s time he was forced to recognize something new – because the behavior of some of his patients (the women in particular) could not be explained otherwise.

The society of his time had invented the unconscious – and at the same time Fascism. That both showed up at the same time was no accident. They were both products of post-modern society – and, indeed, were excellent indicators of it.

Note that I did not speak of causation here – that events proceeded in a simple cause-and-effect manner. The situation was complex – everything effected everything else. All we can say is that the unconscious appeared out of nowhere – an emergent property that appeared because of the latest developments. We can only guess what they were – but some excellent guesses have been made.

But we can say one thing for sure – the unconscious (both individual and collective) had arrived. And we would have to live with it – whether we wanted to or not. Or (more commonly) ignore it – but be controlled by it anyway.

I can now return to the subject – how society has become evil.

You may object (as is now fashionable) that evil is a value judgement and therefore not real. Implying that it is not something to worry about. I will not argue with you about this – since I only have to consult my gut feelings about the reality of evil.

Being human means being moral – with all that implies. If we are immoral (evil) our bodies (our unconscious) knows it and makes our lives miserable in all kinds of ways (some of them lethal). And, at the same time, we project our evil nature onto others – and become determined to eliminate them.

Negative Reality

This was the discovery that ended the Modern world. We discovered we could do everything just the opposite to the way we had been doing them. This new way was more fun – in fact addictive. Once we started doing things this way, we could not stop – until we had finished the job. Until we had destroyed the world completely.

See how irresistible it was?

We had discovered something exquisitely simple – destruction is much easier then construction. So why go to all the work – when tearing things down is so profitable and impresses people so much?

There was, of course, a problem. There must be attractive new technologies to cover up this destructiveness – which is not really so pretty. They serve as a distraction so we won’t notice what is really going on. These so-called smart devices are busy making us stupid.  We love them.

The idea of negative realities comes straight to us from physics where they have been known for quite some time. Every particle has its anti-particle – and it goes much further that that – in ways I cannot comprehend – but they take seriously. That no one else can understand the chosen few does not bother them at all.

I adopt the same attitude – if you cannot understand me – perhaps that is because you have not become enlightened yet – to the way things really are.

After all, we are talking about a simple reversal here – including a reversal of values. Nothing complicated.

Morality in Business

NY Times - Wall St. Redux: Arcane Names Hiding Big Risk

The banks that created risky amalgams of mortgages and loans during the boom — the kind that went so wrong during the bust — are busily reviving the same types of investments that many thought were gone for good. Once more, arcane-sounding financial products likecollateralized debt obligations are being minted on Wall Street.

In my first posting this morning People Like to Be Evil, I covered this same subject. I said:

Our global culture has become strongly biased against compassion because it is not good for business – which has become our predominate passion.

Perhaps you do not see the connection between business and morality – and insist the two are separate. Or even (in your heart of hearts) that morality is bad for business – and should not be considered in this connection. Or that morality should be restricted to religious contexts.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 361 other followers