Archive for the ‘ Political comment ’ Category

The Global Power Structure That Has No Power

The power I am referring to is the power to motivate people. Whether we like it or not – people power is still where it’s at. If it’s not there – we haven’t got it.

You have heard of Globalization – which is supposed to be the next big thing. But I am here to tell you that this next big thing is nothing. Literally. I could go into a long dissertation about something and nothing here – and I am listening to a book right now called Why is there something instead of nothing? that does just that. But I will spare you.

Let me start again. The world (the human world, that is) for the last three hundred years or so has been obsessed with making money. But we (and especially the young) are no longer much interested this. It doesn’t turn us on any more. And if it doesn’t interest us – it is going nowhere. 

Let me put this yet another way. We all know about booms and busts. Everybody gets excited about something (it gets hot) then they lose interest in it – and it gets cold. These cycles (what used to be called the Business Cycle) used to take years. Now they are lucky to last for a day.

This indicates, to me, that they no longer have any substance. There is nothing behind them.

People still want money as much as before – but they no longer want to work for it. They will steal whatever they can lay their hands on (legally) but will only pretend to be working. And this applies to companies, as well as individuals. Everybody. You don’t have to be a genius to see where this leads to.

I have been speaking so far about motivation – or the lack thereof. And I continue to believe this is the most fundamental problem.

But this can also be seen in more concrete ways – we are running out of gas (oil). All the development of the last three hundred years or so was fueled by fossil fuels. Energy reserves left over, by accident, from millions of years of plant life.

And climate change is fast upon us. We can deny it all we want – but it is a fact.

The overall result (and that is all that counts) is this:

Progress is running out of steam.

You Do Not Want to Know About This

Threat Post – Always Outmanned, Always Outgunned

The advertising industry knows that if it takes more than six seconds thought to understand something – it usually doesn’t get thought about at all.

This subject takes more than six seconds – indeed, smart minds have spent years on it. So for most practical purposes – this every important problem might as well not exist.

The problem is the amount of spying that secret government agencies is doing on us. They are determined to know everything there is about us – no matter how trivial.

“This is a problem?” Some will say. “They can snoop on me as much as they want – because I have nothing to hide. We need to find the bad guys, and this will smoke them out.”

But information is power and too much power in the wrong hands is dangerous. They will claim to be protecting us – but as history has shown – they will only be protecting themselves – at our expense.

New York City and the U.S. East Coast Must Take Drastic Actions to Prevent Ocean Flooding

Scientific American June 2013 issue.

Scientific American has refrained by making political comments in the past – but it has gradually realized that this is counter-productive – that Science is political also – like everything else. The latest quantum theory (on page 47) says so explicitly.

But this article (on page 59) with its excellent graphics – is something Americans should know about.

Jeroen Aerts is one of the international experts consulted in developing a plan to protect the East Coast from flooding. He is from the Netherlands, the foremost experts on flood control – since it has been doing it for centuries. Aerts was shocked to hear that regional politics would make a centrally executed plan impossible. He quit in disgust.

This is the final paragraph:’

Do leaders of cities and suburbs all along the Coastal US have the political will to do what’s right for the long term. Or will they postpone the tough decisions and let nature force the consequences on residents later, at considerably more expense and suffering?

What Scientific American is saying (but not very loudly) is that Americans have become helpless. And unable to cope with their problems. This is a scientific fact.

Americans Have no Excuse for Being Poorly-Informed

New York Review - Pakistan: Why Drones Don’t Help

Here is a quote from the article:

When foreigners intervene militarily in a region with disregard for sophisticated understandings of its internal dynamics, they tend, as recent history has shown, to fail horribly. The prevailing discourse in the West about Afghanistan and Pakistan is “simplistic, inaccurate, and alarmingly dehumanizing,” to quote the editors, Shahzad Bashir and Robert D. Crews, in their introduction to the essay collection Under the Drones. The consequences, they find, have been tragic; and the chapters that follow make it difficult to disagree with them.

Americans have little interest in anything outside America – but they do not hesitate to go to war whenever and wherever they please – anyway.

Here is another quote:

By intervening militarily in Afghanistan, the US thrust itself into the middle of this border dispute without adequately recognizing it as such. As a result, two successive American presidents have repeatedly failed to get Afghanistan and Pakistan to take joint responsibility for security in the border areas. Tarzi is surely right when he asserts that “a rearrangement of Pakistan-Afghanistan bilateral relations, beginning with resolving the difficult question of the common boundary between the two countries, seems a necessary ingredient” for peace in the region.

Makes sense – even to me.

I will not say anything about Drone Warfare – except to note that Americans have not thought through the many implications of that either. It sounds wonderful, they think – so it must be wonderful!

Back when I was a low-budget traveler in South-East Asia in the Seventies, we would go to great lengths to get a copy of Time Magazine – thinking that it would contain the latest international news. Imagine our surprise to discover it had different news – depending on what region it was intended for!

The Mass Media (of which Time is an example) writes what it is told to write – whether it is true or not.

Alternative sources, such as the Review, and not hard to get, but most Americans do not seem interested in them.

Cause and Effect

This simple idea was one of the foundations of the Modern world. And one of the most important events in the formation of that World was the Reformation – and the Protestantism that resulted from it.

We cannot now imagine the fervor and violence of the civil and religious wars that followed. And how Science was formed by them. You heard me right – religion, politics, and science were formed from the same mold. From the same world-view. From Wikipedia:

comprehensive world view (or worldview) is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing the entirety of the individual or society’s knowledge and point-of-view, including natural philosophy; fundamental, existential, and normative postulates; or themes, values, emotions, and ethics.[1] The term is a calque of the German word Weltanschauung[ˈvɛlt.ʔanˌʃaʊ.ʊŋ] ( listen), composed of Welt (‘world’) and Anschauung (‘view’ or ‘outlook’).[2] It is a concept fundamental to German philosophy and epistemology and refers to a wide world perception. Additionally, it refers to the framework of ideas and beliefs through which an individual, group or culture interprets the world and interacts with it.

In my mind’s eye I can see my Grandfather repeating  ”Cause and Effect!” over and over in Prayer Meeting, back in the Fifties, while he rocked himself up on his toes to make himself taller. He knew how important it was – it was the foundation of his world –  although he could not have explained it in the least.  His was a world of powerful beliefs – and that was enough for him.

As it turned out, this particular belief had reached its peak, and would decline during my lifetime (long after he was dead) – but of course he did not know that. Few people have recognized this decline since then – and most absolutely refuse to recognize it.

In fact, I am having a hard time formulating the nature of what I am trying to say. How we came to believe in a world of separate chains of events. The key word here is separate.  The belief that things could happen in one part of the world without effecting the rest of the world. The model is the billiard-table – where the original mover (a man holding a cue-stick) sets in motion a series of independent events on a perfectly level surface.

In remote parts of Latin America, where people can afford very little. You will find the people (men only, please) playing billiards – and playing it passionately.

The basic idea behind all this was a divide-and-conquer strategy – as Caesar clearly enunciated. And which was the downfall of the Roman Empire. It seemed to be the road to unlimited power – but in reality, it was the path to total collapse. A collapse we are also seeing in our own time – as Colonialism is collapsing.

The reason for this is simple enough. The world is not complicated (composed of many independent separate events) that can be broken apart and analyzed separately.  It is complex (where everything effects everything else).

I am tempted to go into Complexity Theory (a very important discovery) but that would be too much of a digression. Take it from me – it is a big deal, and represents a break from the past. Just as the Computer represents a break with the past. But in both cases unacknowledged breaks.

It is possible to find things that can be analyzed and exploited separately (in the manner of a laboratory experiment). And this kind of exploitation is what made the Industrial Revolution such a success. The discovery of oil – and seemingly unlimited power – drove people completely crazy.

But, as we are finding out, there is no free lunch. And everything is linked to everything else.

I have relatives (distant relatives, it is true) who are in the oil business in Texas. All of their oil wells were running dry – until fracking was discovered. Now they are ecstatic - they are rich! A mad scramble is on to frack as much and as fast as possible.

No one – and I mean no one – is saying “What do we do when the oil runs out?” The answer seems to be “Who cares? We will solve that problem when we get to it!”

This assumes that the problem can be solved – and solved easily. When every indication is to the contrary. There are plenty of situations where there is no way out – and we seem to be in one of those.

The Vietnam War DID Happen

The Vietnam War was one of the worst disasters in our history. Americans – and even the American Military – thought they learned a lesson from it – one they would never forget. Thirty years later – in the Iraq War – they had forgotten that lesson entirely – that you cannot fight an insurgency. It is simply impossible.

Americans believe that nothing is impossible – at least for them. This was true of us going into the Vietnam War – as told so well in A Rumor of War - which I am listening to now. Philip Caputo did not try to write a polemic against war – he only wrote of his experiences in one. But how anyone could draw any other conclusion is beyond me.

Americans will say they are against war – and say it over and over – but go to war over the slightest provocation – even it they have to make one up.

Obama has Taken Advantage of America

If you say this to Americans, they will say “So what?”

For them, exploitative behavior is normal and inevitable. They know they should be helpless – and therefore they are. While in their topsy-turvy minds they feel not just powerful – but all-powerful.

Now that I have looked that word up, and been assured that it is real (it was first used in 1528) I am going to start talking more about the Topsy-Turvy World:

A state where proper or normal places, values, standards, objects, or facts are reversed.

This, it seems to me, explains a lot – including Obama and his people.

Many Americans will hasten to explain that the opposition, the Republicans, are much worse. And they are right. But a large proportion of the voting public vote for them (or even worse) – and are not ashamed to say so.

In a topsy-turvy world this makes perfect sense. Destruction is the same as construction – even better, because it is easier.

The main thing is to make money – how you make it doesn’t matter.

But this requires one more thing – not noticing what is going on. Americans have become experts at that.

In our topsy-turvy world, this is what stupidity has become.

Shocking News – Congress is not Dead

NY Times  - Make Wall Street Choose: Go Small or Go Home

Senators Sherrod Brown, Democrat of Ohio, and David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, are members of the Senate Banking Committee.

In 2008, at the height of the financial crisis, the government stepped in and decided which Wall Street banks were so large and interconnected that they would receive extraordinary help from the government to enable them to survive. They were deemed, to use a now ubiquitous phrase, too big to fail. Meanwhile, smaller banks in communities across the country, including Cleveland and Covington, La., in the states we represent, were allowed to fail. They were, evidently, too small to save…

Our proposal also curtails the expansion of the government safety net for Wall Street by limiting taxpayer support to traditional banking operations. Under our legislation, financial institutions would be prohibited from transferring nonbank liabilities — like derivatives, repurchase agreements and securities lending — into federally supported banks that benefit from deposit insurance. This would ensure that the government safety net protects only the commercial bank, not the risky investment-banking arms of the megabanks. If the megabanks want to remain large and complex, that’s their choice — but Americans should not have to subsidize their risk-taking. If they fail, their executives and investors — not taxpayers — should pay the price.

We expect a full-throated effort by the megabanks to resist our proposal. The good news is that there is a real and growing bipartisan consensus around our approach. It has drawn support from key regulators like Thomas M. Hoenig, a conservative who is vice chairman of the F.D.I.C. and a former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, and Daniel K. Tarullo, a progressive regulator and a member of the Fed’s board of governors. Our banking system — and the broad economy — will be the stronger for it.

And Congress will be stronger too.

The Soviet Union – a Perfect Hell that Fell Apart

I am listening to Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956.

From the Publisher’s Summary:

In the long-awaited follow-up to her Pulitzer Prize-winning Gulag, acclaimed journalist Anne Applebaum delivers a groundbreaking history of how Communism took over Eastern Europe after World War II and transformed in frightening fashion the individuals who came under its sway.

At the end of World War II, the Soviet Union to its surprise and delight found itself in control of a huge swath of territory in Eastern Europe. Stalin and his secret police set out to convert a dozen radically different countries to Communism, a completely new political and moral system. In Iron Curtain, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Anne Applebaum describes how the Communist regimes of Eastern Europe were created and what daily life was like once they were complete. She draws on newly opened East European archives, interviews, and personal accounts translated for the first time to portray in devastating detail the dilemmas faced by millions of individuals trying to adjust to a way of life that challenged their every belief and took away everything they had accumulated. Today the Soviet Bloc is a lost civilization, one whose cruelty, paranoia, bizarre morality, and strange aesthetics Applebaum captures in the electrifying pages of Iron Curtain.

I remember well the paranoia about Communism in the Fifties. Americans hardly thought about anything else. And with many other men (I can’t remember any women) – I joined the Cold War – because the pay was so good – and the demands were so little. The perfect atmosphere for idiocy of all kinds.

No doubt the same thing happened on the other side of the Iron Curtain – and even more so. By good fortune, I was born on the right side of the curtain.

I have another book (I have so many!) The United States of Fear:

In his new book The United States of Fear, Tom Engelhardt makes clear that Americans should don their crash helmets and buckle their seat belts, because the United States is on the path to a major decline at a startling speed. Engelhardt offers a savage anatomy of how successive administrations in Washington took the “Soviet path”—pouring American treasure into the military, war, and national security—and so helped drive their country off the nearest cliff.

This is the startling tale of how fear was profitably shot into the national bloodstream, how the country—gripped by terror fantasies—was locked down, and how a brain-dead Washington elite fiddled (and profited) while America quietly burned.

I can find nothing wrong with his analysis. But like most Americans I can only say “So what? There is nothing we can do about it.”

Exactly what the citizens of the Soviet Union were saying before their world fell apart.

In this case, history may be repeating itself.

We Have Left the World for a Better One

We used to say of the diseased that “He has left this world for a better one.” Meaning, of course – Heaven. We no longer take this to be a literal truth – but a metaphorical one – since it is obvious that Heaven is not a physical place.

But, for the most part we do not think about questions like this at all – because we don’t have to. Because we now live in a  world where thinking is not necessary. In the world we left behind we believed the world was real and our thoughts could comprehend it.

In our new world this is no longer true – it is a world we have made ourselves and it works exactly the way we want it to work. Its functioning varies from time to time and from place to place – depending on what we believe to be true at the moment. As you can see – it is much more satisfying than the old one.

The result is not capable of being defined exactly – it is more of an attitude – or more accurately – an insanity.

The end result, however, is clear enough. The Human Race has decided to eliminate itself – and replace itself with a fantasy.

We have no idea how this will turn out eventually. But the intermediate result is clear enough – a global collapse whose depth cannot be predicted.

Once again, the Human Race has entered into a unplanned experiment by building an overgrown System.

And giving no thought its stability.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 386 other followers