Posts Tagged ‘ Loss of Self ’

Inequality is Not Necessary for Society to be Destructive

I am busy listening to the course The Modern and the Postmodern. Some of the first lectures are about Rousseau – and his rants against the inequality of his time – which were pronounced, to be sure.

But we have the advantage of living two hundred years later – in an age with an unusual combination of income inequality, and social conformity. And  a society that is destroying itself – to its intense satisfaction.

I live in an age that offers me amazing benefits – I can get anything on the Web (including this blog). But I also live in an age where people have ceased to exist – and are completely unable to realize this.

This, in my opinion, is not good.

The Benefits of Positive Parenting

NY Times

I have believed for a long time that defective parenting is the cause of many of our problems. I have said so loud and clear – but few are inclined to agree with me. They will always give their parents a passing grade – no matter what. And insist the problem is somewhere else – and not in defective parenting (including their own).

This article is an excellent overview of what is called social entrepreneurship.  I have ordered his book How to Change the World. But he will have a hard time convincing me that his kind can really make the world a better place.

I agree entirely with his objectives, but I think they are too optimistic for the times we live in.

The Decision to Abandon Life

People are crazy creatures, and our craziness has gotten worse. We can no longer tell if we are getting better or getting worse – and don’t even want to try.

I might as well state my opinion up front – we have definitely gotten worse. And we have no way of stopping this trend.

The human race started off with a fantastic advantage – of all creatures, we were the only ones who could understand what was going on,. But this understanding consisted in a strange combination of activities. We believed in spirits, and believed in them fervently. We differentiated ourselves into multitude of cultures – each with its own language and territory.

Then civilization happened. How this happened, we will never know – but did happen, and  consisted of an explosion of interacting innovations. We were off to the races – and we have never stopped.

We never said “Whoa, lets slow down for a bit!” We just went as fast as we could, until things broke. And then wondered what happened to us. Not very smart behavior – but we were not very smart.

In other words, we always overdo things. Including our latest developments.

Having moved from a developed county to a relatively undeveloped one, I can see the contrast plainly. And I can see how my neighbors here have now idea of what is going to hit them. Instead, they can hardly wait to do the same thing.

But I started to talk about another subject – our decision to abandon life. Another one of our unconscious decisions that we were not aware of at all. And which we now deny emphatically.

In the beginning, as I mentioned before, we had an acute sense of being part of life. And we expressed this in a variety of ways. All life-affirming.

At some point (over a period of several centuries) we switched and became life-denying. And never noticed we were doing this. It seemed perfectly logical at the time – but what this strange logic was, we can only guess.

I suspect part of the reason was our mind’s ability to conceive of opposites as identical. Being against life seemed to be the same as being for it. And in a way, better.

So we went for the obvious.

Who We Are and What We Are

These are two different things – which we sometimes discover to our amazement. Who we are is a human being, our amazing genetic inheritance as a unique species. What we are, on the other hand. depends on where we – what situation we are in, and it varies as our situation varies.

We would like to think that who we are also includes our individuality - the personality we develop as we grown up – and that only changes slowly. But this concept is much more difficult to work with – even though we have to deal with it in ourselves, and others all the time.

We can never be sure whether we are dealing with who are – or what we are. People, individually or collectively, can change suddenly without warning. We are very undependable beings – contrary to what we think of ourselves.

We have to give up the exalted view of ourselves ( being a little lower than the angels) – and face the facts. This is not nearly as difficult as we seem to feel. But we would rather die than change.

What I have said so far is easy. No comes the hard part. Where did this defective view of ourselves come from?

I think is is the unlikely combination of two things – Religion (as it is embodied in Business) and Science (as it is embodied in Technology). Note the key word here embodied. I will not try to explain it – I will assume its meaning is obvious.

Technology can always be improved – and we have assumed from that, since we are so closely associated with our technologies that we can always be improved too. This is not rocket science, just common sense – it seems to us.

But it contains a fundamental error – our technology is part of what we are. But it is not who we are (humans).

In fact, as techno-beings we have rejected ourselves as human beings. To use plain language, we have become monsters (or demons). And we consider this a vast improvement.

Because, thanks to Business, we have become rich monsters.

A Society That is Determined Not to Work

Perhaps you have not noticed this – but it is one of the defining features of our times – our Dysfunctional Times. It just doesn’t work – and we are determined to keep it that way. And even more strangely, we are determined to not notice that we are this way.

This is shameful behavior, and we ought to be ashamed of ourselves. But we are not – we are pleased with ourselves instead. As if we had some great accomplishment to brag about.

I am tempted to philosophize here, and speak of our discovery of negative being or perhaps negative reality. We have discovered that we could move in an entirely new direction – one that will result in our total destruction. But instead of horrifying us – this attracts us.

We should rewrite our history to show how this fundamental transformation took place. This hasn’t been done before because this possibility never occurred to us – it was too shocking to even be considered. But now it has happened, we need to backtrack and take it seriously.

We can easily answer the question which bedevils us “Why aren’t things working?” The answer is “Because we don’t want them to work!”

We have gone into a self-destruct mode without realizing it – because the first thing we destroyed was our selves – our self-awareness.

You may object – as I did myself – that we have been able to make some things work. New software comes out all time time – Windows 8, for example. But this only happens in an environment that is determined to not make things work overall.

I speak from experience here. I worked in the software industry for ten years – and I watched these software companies self-destruct over and over. And noticed how no one was noticing this. They were not only destroying themselves, they were destroying all the people associated with them – their employees, investors, and customers.

There I was, the solitary observer at the end of an era, noticing what everyone else was incapable of noticing. And wondering why. I am reminded of the Stoic Philosophers at the end of the Roman Empire. And it seems to me our situation is similar.

And this is not a bad analogy. It is one we could use to our advantage. The Roman Empire was over-developed – as our own is. We only need to ask ourselves “What is the over-development in our own time?”

Two thousand years ago, this would have been obvious from looking at a map of the Empire. It was physically over-extended – it covered far more territory than it could defend. But accurate maps would not appear until much later – after the Empire was long gone.

What kind of map can we provide for our own time? I think we need to start from where we are – with an honest evaluation of where we are – completely messed up. And go from there.

We have made some assumptions – just as the Romans did – that didn’t work. One of them was that perpetual exponential economic growth had to happen – or more correctly, had to continue to happen. It doesn’t take much thought to realize this is not possible.

But Americans do not think; they just insist it has to happen anyway. Their business plan cannot possibly work – but they are determined to make it work anyway.

The Poetry of Wealth

I continue to read Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350-550 AD. Which no doubt seems to most to be a strange perversion.

This is from Chaper 14 – Commercium spiritale; The spiritual exchange of Palinus of Nola and the Poetry of Wealth, 395-408.

From page 117:

The upper-class residents of Beneventum whose “undefeated hearts” had impressed Symmachus when they rallied to repair their city after an earthquake had don so out of a loyalty to their hometown that stretched back over generations. Symmachus himself had shown “the fine ardor of a Roman soul” as part of a longstanding dialog between his family and the Roman people.

By contrast, Paulinus’s giving was tilted toward heaven. It was part of a timeless dialog between himself, God, and Saint Felix. No matter how impressive the shrine at Cimitile may have been, the “people” whose “favor” Paulinus sought were invisible people. They were God and his saints.

Between 395 and 408, Paulinus wrote a yearly poem for the festival of Saint Felix of Nola. This was not just poetry – any educated person of the time was expected to do this (and often to sing it also).

This was religious poetry. And it involved the contrast of opposites – the denigration of wealth in this world – with the incommensurable, unimaginable glory once it was stored in heaven.

To me, something similar is happening in our time – as I said in my other posting today Television and the Final Breakdown. We have denied our selves (our bodies) and invested in an imaginary world.

Which is not going to do us the slightest good.

Machines, Organizations, People

Note that I put people last on this list. The machine, expressed in organizations, has been vastly important. People were only one of the many kinds of the raw material used by them. It is no wonder they have been treated badly.

All this happened because people (way back when) thought of large organizations as a way to gain power – which they certainly were – and this idea took over. But people (genetically) did not change; we were still small-scale people; well-adapted for that way of life – but not for what followed.

In what followed, people were overwhelmed more and more by the large-scale world that they created. We should have kept ourselves at the center (stayed in control) but we did not. We allowed ourselves to be controlled instead. And now the very idea that we should be in control sounds ridiculous – and is, because we no longer exist, as humans.

This last point is one that no one can understand. It seems to them that if they look like humans, smell like humans, and walk like humans – they are humans. When they are not. Something has happened that has transformed them entirely. And something they will never understand in a thousand years – if they last that long.

What I am saying is nothing new. The Old Testament prophets said it much better than I can. But they were also ignored.

Is there a solution? Yes, there is not just one solution, but many of them – but the first step, as with any recovery, is the recognition of where we are. Until we do that, we are not going to have much luck doing anything.

The Economic Boom (and Bust) of the Late Roman Empire

As I said in my last posting, I am listening to Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350-550 AD. I have already spoken of my dissatisfaction with the Kindle format, and this has not lessened. In the future I will continue my policy of buying a paper book if an Audible book is especially interesting.

Until now, nearly everyone believed that the decline of the Empire was progressive, marked by the Gothic Sack of Rome in 410. The latest view is that the first two centuries of Roman Rule were an abnormal boom period, that made it difficult for the Empire to continue. If I could only copy text from the Kindle version, I could make this clear to you.

But I will make the comparison to the American boom of the Fifties and Sixties. In the 20th Century things moved much faster – trends that took centuries in the Roman Empire took only decades in the 20th.

The American boom occurred at the end the end of WWII, when people could spend the money they were forced to save during the War. My parents were part of that boom – and they (and many like them) used their money to buy a beautiful little town in rural Illinois – and then destroy it (as development usually does).

Like many other young men with an Engineering Degree (they were easy to get back then) I benefited from the Cold War – which destroyed the USSR, and nearly destroyed America – although this has never been recognized.

What has been recognized (although grudgingly) was the decline of America – and indeed the whole world, in the last half of the last century. The Internet produced a boom of its own – but also a world economy (Globalization) – with no way of managing it.

This was proceeded by something even more serious – the people no longer existed, but had become consumers only.

We should have learned from History (especially the impact of Wealth), but we have not.

The Computer as an Industry

I worked in this Industry for 20 years – 10 years in Southern California (Ventura Country, LA, Orange County, and San Diego) and 10 years in Silicon Valley. It was an experience I would not wish on a dog. You have to be tough and savvy to survive in that world – and I was neither.

I have called it an industry – but it was an industry that ended the Industrial era. Which was based on Manufacturing. This was always futile business – making more so people could buy more in an exponential growth curve. Eventually it had to end – and it has.

We have ended up in a dead end, with nowhere to go. We will have to start over completely, building a new world from the ruins of the old one.

We have no idea where this will go. We can only say “Fasten your seat belts!”

Living With Terror

TED – What Fear Can Teach Us

TED – The Danger of a Single Story by Chimamanda Adichie

We can easily speak of living in terror for a number of reasons. But we are not used to the idea of living with terror – as a normal part of living – a condition so normal we don’t usually notice it. I believe this is the situation for most of us. And that we cannot be compassionate towards ourselves or others without realizing this.

Terror was part of the many Totalitarian regimes that flourished in the 20th Century. The rulers of these governments used terror (successfully)  to control their subjects. Once terror took over, there was no escape from it – except a complete destruction of the country. Usually by outside forces, but in the case of the USSR, by internal forces that no one has adequately understood.

But a new kind of terror is now in force, as part of Globalization, it enforces conformity just as ruthlessly. It can easily blend with traditional terrorism, depending on local circumstances. But the trend is toward the dominance of the new type, because it works so easily – no external force is needed. It is enforced by everyone – from the bottom up. As Sheldon S. Wolin says  in Democracy Inc.

Once affluence is reached, everyone is terrified of losing it. I speak here of individuals, not societies. Individuals are terrified of  losing it, of becoming homeless. For human society as a whole, however,  we have the opposite situation – we are incapable of saving it, and do not seem eager to do so.

The reason for this paradoxical behavior is not hard to understand. Why try to save something that is so evil?

This new kind of terror is part of what we now call Democracy – in an amazing about-face. I was puzzled by the use of this world to justify the Iraq War. We were going to bring Democracy to the entire Middle East! When it was clear to me that we did not have democracy even in America.

Underneath this confusion of words, something deeper was going on. We had discovered a new way of life and were determined to convert others to this new religion (especially Islam). We are now trying to do the same in Afghanistan – without much success.

If we were smart (which we certainly are not) we would make an effort to understand ourselves, and our puzzling behavior. Instead, we simply demonstrate, over and over, that we know the right way to be – by not being at all!

This is the solution to living with terror – by not living at all. And by having no awareness of this, at all.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 364 other followers